orbit_2009

China’s probably wary of Bitcoin's US dominance in dev teams. The history of Bitcoin forks and stuff makes it vulnerable. Just think about how devs can push changes anytime.

Sure, ETFs and newer investors might not know about all the Core issues, but hardcore Bitcoin enthusiasts are definitely in the loop. The market still cares about these disputes, even if it seems like new investors…

Been holding Bitcoin for eight years and honestly, I think the bull run is done for now. A lot of chaos with tariffs from Trump didn't help, plus the latest Bitcoin Core release. Trust in the development team is shaky…

IBD? You mean Initial Blockchain Download? Yeah, Knots still has to deal with all the transactions in a block, even if they think it’s spam.

If Knot pulls ahead, I doubt it’ll drastically change OP_RETURN usage. Older nodes are still around, and if miners accept it, it’ll still be in blocks occasionally.

True that. If Knots became dominant, it might help, but it isn’t gonna eliminate spam. There’s always a workaround, like fake pubkeys, right?

Bitcoin is still pretty young, and with a small market cap, it can swing wildly on a tweet or bad economic news. But the long-term fundamentals are solid, so don’t let short-term chaos freak you out.

Coins are valid regardless of how they’re created. Future soft forks can play around with spending conditions.

Did you actually take his advice and buy some bitcoin? Or did you just forget about it after that ride? If you kept track, you’d have seen it blast from 50 cents to about 20 bucks in a year. That driver probably became…

Just because someone’s rich doesn’t mean they’re smart or telling the truth. Look at Trump! Salinas needs to back up his predictions with actual data, otherwise it’s just hot air.

For Bitcoin to hit $800k, every person would need $2k worth of it. That’s crazy! Without real demand, it seems a bit delusional.

Yeah, but in the early years, everything outperforms. Bitcoin’s hype could fade when it reaches a certain market cap.

Gold is shiny and all, but it’s also volatile. Look at its history. If you can handle gold, you can handle Bitcoin. It has durability and is decentralized.

Do you guys really think Bitcoin is a solid store of value? I used to be all in on that idea, but after thinking it through, I’ve got my doubts.

Ordinal supporters want their data eternal, but suggesting IPFS gets ignored. They'd have to set up an IPFS node themselves.

Funny how some think adding inscriptions raises fees, making it hard for users. Others think higher fees are good for miners, securing the network.

One major issue with Bitcoin is how closely it's tied to the stock market. With all the AI hype and Nvidia driving things, when that bubble bursts, BTC is likely going down too.

I can say whatever I want. Bitcoin has flaws, that’s clear. If the market can only take a certain amount, that fixed supply can hurt. No adjustments for demand, that’s a problem.

Dude, you’re totally wrong. ETH and DOGE have no supply cap. It's a clear infinite supply figure. Seriously, read a dictionary.

LOL, wrong. ETH and DOGE have infinite supplies. Look it up! That infinity symbol literally means unlimited supply. Your lack of basic facts is telling.