bull2011

Hasn’t he been talking about this "everything app" for ages? It could be a payment tool. I wouldn’t be shocked if it includes crypto elements, but who knows? He might just want to create a new PayPal.

If you’re banking on historical data for future predictions, I’d skip anything before 2013. Too volatile and immature back then.

They don't really control the price unless they're massive market makers. Demand drives price, and Bitcoin is just maturing.

Can you explain how immigrants doing jobs here is any different than Canadians doing the same? They’re all contributing to the GDP. And yeah, dropping birthrates can be a problem down the line, but that won’t hit right…

Right, and this is all before any criminal charges hit him. I'd be shocked if he doesn't end up behind bars.

No one really knows which coins will moon. I just pointed out some issues with DOT. Good or bad fundamentals don’t always equate to gains.

Most hacks lately have been cross-bridge issues. DOT relies on bridges too, so I can’t trust that tech to be secure. Plus, what has it really created that’s groundbreaking? Seems like they’re just building on existing…

Definitely undervalued, but comparing it to Ethereum isn’t fair. It's not on the same level. Avalanche had some questionable marketing strategies that misled many about its potential. I mean, how decentralized is it if…

Why would a government want this anyway? Who benefits from it? It's easier for them to just regulate surrounding activities and tax the profits.

Not record time, but how long did Kirchnerism last versus Milei's free market rules? Kirchner was 23 years, Milei only 9 to 15 months with Congress blocking him. No excuses left.

Why would anyone trust AI-created cryptocurrencies? How will you fix bugs in it when you don’t even know the tech? If it’s too easy to make, then it’s gonna feel generic and no one will care.

Right? But it’s hard to pin down Satoshi. Could be a person or a whole team. Plus, Ben Mezrich wrote Bitcoin Billionaires. That might get a film adaptation too, but I’m skeptical about its quality.

Regulations are already happening, like flagging stolen funds. But why would they push everyone to CEXes? That just adds to the risk of connecting wallets to criminal activities.

When NFTs arrived, I thought gaming companies would jump on board for skin trading. Imagine accounts being like wallets where you own everything! But then, what about customer protection laws? Those no-ID transactions…

I’m not sure there’s one clear way to think about regulations. Everyone's got their agenda. Tbh, saying open-source code should be illegal because some bad actors use it sounds ridiculous. We definitely need to deal…

Of course they can be regulated, since a person owns them. If these bots go rogue and commit crimes, the owner will be in the spotlight. Like, if a robot goes on a rampage, it’s the builder who gets blamed.

What happens when this whole thing gets shut down later? I mean, if they rule it illegal, what becomes of those visas? Not that I care much rich people will always land on their feet anyway. But it’s kinda amusing to…

Your comparison really shows Bitcoin’s uniqueness. Stocks rise steadily with less volatility, while Bitcoin faces wild ups and downs. Surviving those rough patches really pays off.

But you can’t say BGB has no utility just because it’s an ERC-20. It still has its uses, just different from BNB.

BGB's utility is mainly on Bitget, while BNB has a broader reach. It’s like comparing apples to oranges.