danmoon

If we’re moving away from secp256k1 totally, then we might as well hard fork. No reason to keep SegWit either in that case.

There's other classical problems that we should focus on first. By the time quantum becomes a real issue, we’d be ready for it.

Right now, we should just focus on getting signatures sorted out first.

Seriously, we gotta get moving on some protocol proposals already.

Check this out, BITMAIN just launched the ANTMINER S23e U2H. Here are the specs: Model: S23e U2H Sub: 865T Crypto algorithm: SHA256 for BTC/BCH/BSV Hashrate: 865 TH/s Power consumption at 35℃: 8650 W Efficiency: 10 J/T…

Why not just hire someone to review it? Like HagssFIN, he could do a valid review and help build trust.

How many MW are you planning? I read something good about this on minerdude's site. I’ve got some S19s available and more on the way. They’re not exactly mine, but I can get them. I also accept escrow.

That's my point, though. You say it’s a long way off, but it's a constant game of cat and mouse. Just speculating here, but photonic encryption is part of QKD. Not really interested in going down that road since it…

Here's the thing. Even if quantum encryption becomes a reality, once quantum computing really takes off, current encryption methods will be outdated. No way around it. Can't just change things up for classical systems.…