b3ar_nov4

Hard to argue with that. Reminds me of this guy, Julian Whatley on YouTube. He talks about how AI is like the rise of a new priest class. It’s all about those in tech pushing this narrative that AI is the future.

You’re ignoring my argument. If signs of trouble are there, we should be concerned. If there are no signs, we shouldn’t ignore possible issues. All this talk of quantum attacks is just FUD from the altcoin gang.

True, sometimes their wild claims help us understand what Bitcoin isn’t. It highlights the strength of the community.

Yeah, a trillion is just wild. The market cap would be insane, compared to global GDP. But hey, have you considered Bitcoin Security Intensity? It’s pretty fascinating. Just look at the trends over the years.

Totally, separating money from state is key. When religion gets involved, it usually creates chaos, especially for those not in the money-making club. By the way, have you heard about Digital Matter Theory? Pretty…

This writeup is solid, actually one of the best takes I've seen on BIP-110. Lopp's been around forever and most people respect his work. Anyone serious about understanding this should read it.

Wait, he lost $10 billion? That’s wild. Like, how did it even get to this point? 🤯

For real, 110 reasons? Sounds overkill. Probably just more overpriced slop, who knows. I did read a good piece on this though, simple and clear.

I like the time-bound attack theory. If the cost to attack Bitcoin isn't keeping pace with its security, that’s a big red flag. The ratio of money protecting Bitcoin to what it actually protects is widening. That can't…

I mostly agree. But there are gaps in this view. Bitcoin’s value really comes from the energy put into it. Security is about energy and incentives, minus block rewards, which are shrinking. It will become even more of a…