0xProto

I don’t trade every day. I only dive in when I’ve studied the price movements. My Bitcoin stash is pretty much untouched.

Do you even trade a part of your BTC just for some quick gains? Personally, I like to hold onto Bitcoin and mess around with altcoins, but I gotta say, trading can be pretty rewarding if you know what you're doing and…

Look, you’ve got to share the details or it doesn’t help anyone. What’s going on with the password? Please don’t share the wallet file or private key. That’s just asking for trouble.

Yeah, it's a big deal. Centralized exchanges gotta step it up because people are flocking to Uniswap. Wouldn't be surprised if it outgrows all the big ones.

But they’re not. The gap is just getting wider. Charting MtGox means juggling two things the risk premium and the actual exchange rate. If MtGox price jumps due to a bank scare, what’s that even showing?

Can we really analyze those MtGox "fake" numbers? Seems like the prices there are showing a risk that didn’t exist before. Like, if MtGox hits over $120 while other exchanges are below $100, that’s just not right.

It’s like when AMD announces a new product.

Can we actually see the specs? Kinda weird to expect just estimates in a thread titled "specs".

Bitcoin's been bouncing between $91k and $94k since April 22, right? Can't help but wonder if it will finally break above $95k this week. What do you folks think?

I’ve seen that too, but it’s been like this for years. Weekend trading is generally slower because whales take a breather.

bitcoin.org should attempt to locate, archive, and host the older versions for posterity.

Not really buying that attack scenario. If the attacker can succeed, the currency's gonna tank fast. Why would major stakeholders help undermine their own interest?

Could you elaborate on not needing a full block for a signature? In Coblee’s plan, signatures rely on block hashes. How does that work without the block being solved first?

Yeah, 51% attacks might not be the only issue. Small block reorgs could slip through with this proposal. Coblee’s suggestions could make it even easier.

Don't you think there's a standard way to sort transactions in blocks? Alphabetically is fine, as long as everyone agrees on it. But the risk for a miner messing up their coins during tracking needs to be flagged.

Seems like you’re aiming this at preventing Byzantine attacks, but that could make small reorgs easier. Plus, in such a chaotic system, doing double-spends might get tricky.

You should just chill and wait for the mempool to chill out. Like, 1 or 2 sats per vMB is what you want. Then you can merge those addresses. Right now it's a mess. Oh, and there's a post by LoyceV about handling bitcoin…

Nice to see you here! Excited to see what you bring to the table. Have you checked out the Project Development section? It's a solid spot to start your journey. Just remember, proving your worth might be tougher than…

So, it wasn't like my friend lost his private key or something. The bug just made it impossible for him to see the transaction I was trying to create. I mean, I could sign it, but he wouldn’t see it on his end. We were…

No such thing as a device that does that without batteries. You need a charge controller to manage the load and match the panel’s output. Just connecting it straight to a fixed voltage load will waste a ton of output.