So what's the deal with Grayscale's push to turn GBTC into a spot ETF? SEC just shot them down, citing high risks. Why does a futures ETF get the green light when it's riskier? 🤔
The Ongoing Saga of Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S.
22 replies 358 views
Honestly, I don't get the fuss. Futures don't have actual BTC backing them, making them less risky, right? The spot ETF has more risk because of the actual buying and storing of BTC. Something else is up with the SEC's reasoning, imo.
Grayscale's situation is a total mystery. They claim it’s discrimination. Now they’re dragging the SEC to court to explain themselves. Makes you think what’s really going on behind closed doors.
cyberchainMember
Posts: 1 · Reputation: 222
#4Jul 13, 2017, 01:20 PM
Just checked out Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust. Seems like they're just a mutual fund, right? They have a manager and a custodian, Coinbase. So how risky can it be, really?
AtomicForkFull Member
Posts: 352 · Reputation: 479
#5Jul 13, 2017, 05:03 PM
This whole ETF thing is wild. I suspect SEC chairman Gensler is a bit salty about Grayscale’s name. But seriously, why block a spot ETF? Seems like they just want to halt the whole crypto scene.
wallet_oracleMember
Posts: 225 · Reputation: 170
#6Jul 13, 2017, 10:30 PM
Saw the news that Grayscale might have won a lawsuit against the SEC? If that's true, it could mean big things for the ETF approval process.
It's baffling why futures ETFs get approved while spot ones don’t. I think most traders already know what they're getting into with futures.
maxi_yieldNewbie
Posts: 38 · Reputation: 5
#8Jul 14, 2017, 07:30 AM
If Grayscale manages to get that spot ETF approved after Bitcoin hits its low, things might get interesting. The futures crowd seems to be losing steam.
raven_2020Member
Posts: 225 · Reputation: 61
#9Jul 14, 2017, 10:28 AM
You know, Gensler might think he’s doing the right thing, but this could backfire on him big time.
LOL, the SEC is really in a corner here. They have to explain why they approve one and not the other. Could be anything, honestly.
Seems like the SEC is losing a ton of cases lately. Grayscale, XRP, Binance... if they keep this up, it’ll be interesting to see the fallout.
But are they really losing money? They’ve racked up some serious fines from exchanges. The whole thing seems off.
CalmFalconMember
Posts: 262 · Reputation: 176
#13Jul 15, 2017, 01:21 PM
That’s true... but I doubt they’re sweating over legal costs. The spot ETF saga is dragging on and on.
What do you mean by costs? Like, how much do they actually spend fighting these cases? Got any numbers?
I don’t have stats, but they’ve filed a ton of actions. They’re definitely busy in court.
Yeah, but they’re also making bank from fines. If they don’t approve the ETFs soon, we might see some price movement.
Let’s be real, the SEC isn’t losing much money. They profit off fines. Just wondering when they’ll approve the ETFs. Maybe after the halving?
I feel like the SEC is trying to keep capital from flowing into crypto. A spot ETF would attract serious money and disrupt the old guard.
block_bossMember
Posts: 98 · Reputation: 248
#19Jul 18, 2017, 03:05 AM
Dude, the market has been influenced by various factors, not just the SEC. Exchanges crashing, China bans, Even Elon messing around.
AtomicForkFull Member
Posts: 352 · Reputation: 479
#20Jul 18, 2017, 05:58 AM
But who’s manipulating the market? I’d love to know. All these early adopters are still anonymous.
Related topics
- New US Bill Could Criminalize Bitcoin Transactions Over $10k 20
- Legal Action Against CSW Regarding Bitcoin Logo Usage 19
- Breaking Free from Government Control with Bitcoin 20
- Is it legal to sell Bitcoin to undocumented immigrants? 10
- Return of Bitcoin from Mt.Gox: What's Next? 11
- Bitcoin's Status as a Commodity: Is It Worth Celebrating? 4