A legal case just dropped in New York where this guy, Noah Doe, is trying to claim ownership of 39,069 Bitcoin wallets that have been inactive forever. He says these wallets are 'abandoned' and quoted some law to back it up. Kinda wild, right?
Lawsuit Over 39,069 Bitcoin Wallets: Who's the Real Owner?
18 replies 97 views
This whole situation is just what we needed for some Bitcoin drama. I mean, Noah should just sue Craig Wright while he's at it. The Battle of Satoshis could be real.
So, I read the legal filing and honestly, it makes no sense. The wallets aren't physically located anywhere. They’re just data on the internet spread across nodes worldwide. How does that even work with property laws?
nova_atlasMember
Posts: 156 · Reputation: 90
#4Oct 2, 2022, 01:51 AM
Another day, another Faketoshi trying to grab attention. This dude just wants a spotlight on himself. Can’t we figure out a way to put him in his place? It's cringe how he tarnishes Bitcoin's reputation.
Honestly, this guy's legal quest seems ridiculous. He’s just spreading FUD about quantum tech. Like seriously, how does that even make sense?
I agree, don’t respond to unknown OP_RETURN messages. It’s risky and could lead to trouble. Just ignore them, not worth the hassle.
I saw a story about a wallet that sat dormant for 16 years but suddenly came back to life. If that can happen, why is this guy claiming he can just take ownership after 5 years? Satoshi said treat lost coins as donations to the network, after all.
wallet_oracleMember
Posts: 225 · Reputation: 170
#8Oct 2, 2022, 10:42 AM
Tracking down 39,069 wallets? Crazy dedication, or just too much free time? Ignoring him might just be the best move. Who says the wallet owners don’t want to keep their privacy?
Before anyone claims any Bitcoin, better check if it’s linked to crime. Craig Wright tried saying one address was his, and it was tied to Mt. Gox hacks. Why hasn’t anyone sued him yet?
Maybe he’s trying to get ahead of quantum computing stuff? If he wins the lawsuit, could he move coins around without clear ownership? Sounds sketchy.
wallet_2018Member
Posts: 116 · Reputation: 41
#11Oct 2, 2022, 07:17 PM
This just feels like a circus act. Dude thinks he can just claim wallets without any real backing. Why not just go claim Satoshi’s wallet while he’s at it?
I doubt he’ll get anything if the coins stay in non-custodial wallets. But if he wins and those coins end up in custodial accounts, he might actually get a shot.
Someone's trying to be the next Craig Wright, huh? Remember when that guy claimed he owned a bunch of wallets? He got called a fraud. Not smart to mess with the community.
It’s wild watching people get creative in how they try to claim wealth. But yeah, custodial exchanges could be in a tricky spot if this goes anywhere.
His motives are unclear, but there’s a chance real owners might not even know about this lawsuit. If they ever want to move their coins, it’ll be through decentralized exchanges.
Ten years ago, exchanges didn’t have all this KYC. Now, any big transactions are scrutinized. No way crypto millionaires will fall for his scheme.
SilentWizardMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 107
#17Oct 4, 2022, 11:43 AM
Legal Situs is the term to know here. Possession counts for a lot, but with Bitcoin, things get messy. New York's the main player here for jurisdiction.
It does sound logical he claims these as abandoned. But it's like finding a car without keys and thinking you can just take it. There could be legal repercussions.
ben.matrixNewbie
Posts: 3523 · Reputation: 35
#19Oct 4, 2022, 01:56 PM
Maybe he’s just looking for some publicity. Who knows, could be a marketing stunt for something else he’s working on.
Related topics
- New US Bill Could Criminalize Bitcoin Transactions Over $10k 20
- Robinhood Faces SEC Scrutiny Over Crypto Assets 2
- Legal Action Against CSW Regarding Bitcoin Logo Usage 19
- Breaking Free from Government Control with Bitcoin 20
- Who should we trust with our data? 21
- Is it legal to sell Bitcoin to undocumented immigrants? 10