Is Crypto Facing a Regulatory Siege?

17 replies 267 views
mr_diamondFull Member
Posts: 2 · Reputation: 569
#1Apr 27, 2020, 12:55 PM
FATF has declared war on crypto, especially Bitcoin. Centralized exchanges need to be ditched. Bitcoin's all about privacy, not a tool for government control. It's meant to protect us from the state.
6 Reply Quote Share
sam_rocketSenior Member
Posts: 15 · Reputation: 1413
#2Apr 27, 2020, 07:08 PM
But think about it. Swiss banks are still thriving despite scandals, while Bitcoin's under constant regulatory pressure. People love centralized exchanges for their convenience, and they basically serve the government.
6 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 59 · Reputation: 24
#3Apr 27, 2020, 09:32 PM
Let's break this down. The FATF consists of major countries, but most of them are actually crypto-friendly. With 6 out of 7 being supportive, they could be outvoted. I doubt they can just impose their will.
4 Reply Quote Share
grimnodeSenior Member
Posts: 25 · Reputation: 1140
#4Apr 27, 2020, 10:27 PM
Agreed, but after the G20 meeting, they did mention the need for more scrutiny. It's a tug-of-war between governments and exchanges. I just hope DEXs don’t cave to those demands. Privacy matters.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 20 · Reputation: 20
#5Apr 28, 2020, 03:41 AM
What does being ‘crypto-friendly’ even mean? The U.S. and Japan have heavy regulations and licensing that restrict trading freedom. Japan even kicked privacy coins off exchanges.
6 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 10 · Reputation: 160
#6Apr 28, 2020, 09:55 AM
Lol, good luck enforcing it. Sure, they'll crack down on centralized platforms, but there are always ways to stay anonymous with Bitcoin. It’s the average Joe who'll get hurt, not the pros.
0 Reply Quote Share
sage777Full Member
Posts: 7 · Reputation: 652
#7Apr 28, 2020, 01:21 PM
If global restrictions hit, it'll mess up Bitcoin’s core function. It's meant to help the unbanked, who often can’t pass KYC. FATF’s stance isn't new but good luck with enforcing it.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 59 · Reputation: 24
#8Apr 28, 2020, 06:25 PM
Spot on! It won't be easy. Sure, they’ll talk tough, but not all countries will comply with FATF’s demands. This won’t be a smooth ride.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 10 · Reputation: 160
#9Apr 28, 2020, 09:20 PM
FATF means all member countries are likely already on board with new rules. It’s frustrating, but it’s happening.
1 Reply Quote Share
probablynothingFull Member
Posts: 29 · Reputation: 589
#10Apr 29, 2020, 01:23 AM
Right. G20 leaders have committed, but implementation takes time and faces political hurdles. Plus, many countries don’t just follow FATF blindly. They’ve been dodging compliance for years.
1 Reply Quote Share
mr_diamondFull Member
Posts: 2 · Reputation: 569
#11Apr 29, 2020, 07:09 AM
I’m not bothered by Uncle Sam's control. If Arthur fixes his exchange issues, I’ll be fine. I don't need the government keeping me broke.
4 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 46 · Reputation: 161
#12Apr 29, 2020, 12:52 PM
You want Bitcoin to be as illegal as drugs? Without some regulation, it won't gain traction. FATF rules could actually protect against bad actors.
0 Reply Quote Share
shard_2018Senior Member
Posts: 2 · Reputation: 1602
#13Apr 29, 2020, 12:59 PM
Yeah, but this regulation might lead to a crackdown on privacy coins. It could force crypto underground. We need regulation to weed out scammers and hacks.
2 Reply Quote Share
fullnodeSenior Member
Posts: 151 · Reputation: 1205
#14May 1, 2020, 07:21 AM
Most people aren’t trying to hide their money. Many businesses want to stay compliant to avoid issues. Eventually, you’ll find few places that aren’t following the rules.
0 Reply Quote Share
alpha42Newbie
Posts: 10 · Reputation: 10
#15May 3, 2020, 08:39 AM
Most regulations seem to create barriers, not help. FATF wants control, and it’s disheartening to see experienced users buy into the fear.
2 Reply Quote Share
eric.degenSenior Member
Posts: 8 · Reputation: 1427
#16May 3, 2020, 10:01 AM
I don’t think it’s a war between equal sides. If governments agree on actions, exchanges will have no choice. They want to be seen as legal.
3 Reply Quote Share
fullnodeSenior Member
Posts: 151 · Reputation: 1205
#17May 3, 2020, 03:58 PM
Exactly! The outcry from VASPs is real. They’re just trying to operate as regular businesses. FATF needs to enable compliance, not hinder it.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 1111 · Reputation: 35
#18May 3, 2020, 08:08 PM
True, but it’s a mixed bag. FATF guidelines could help ensure banks don’t unfairly deny services to crypto-related businesses.
4 Reply Quote Share

Related topics