What do you all think about this crypto mixer situation?
Crypto Mixers and Privacy: US Policy Changes?
20 replies 224 views
So, there's this report that talks about how mixers can protect financial privacy while also mentioning bad actors like North Korea. Does this mean the US is gonna rethink their mixer regulations?
TryNinja dropped the report link about mixers yesterday. The convo there is heating up. It seems like mixers might get a legal boost, but there are still lots of restrictions. Can mixer operators really know where coins come from?
f0rk_5tackNewbie
Posts: 124 · Reputation: 3
#4Sep 16, 2022, 04:29 AM
Honestly, the Treasury seems to be covering up for some shady stuff. If they’re so big on privacy now, why not start with Monero or ZCash? They're still banned in the US and offer way better privacy than mixers.
alex_whaleMember
Posts: 99 · Reputation: 229
#5Sep 16, 2022, 07:24 AM
I don’t see it as a pivot at all. They’re just saying mixers need to keep records and report suspicious stuff, which totally undermines their purpose. Like, who’s gonna give their ID to a mixer?
cyberlaserMember
Posts: 18 · Reputation: 76
#6Sep 18, 2022, 07:40 AM
Exactly. Those reasons for using mixers are mostly for people whose identities are already compromised. If they can track you through spending habits, why even bother with mixers?
But wait, if mixers have to register with FinCEN and report transactions, how is that even gonna work? Anony users won’t touch that.
What we really need is a system like the Bank Secrecy Act where small transactions stay private and scrutiny only kicks in for large amounts. No one’s laundering money with a few bucks.
Totally. It feels like the US thinks it can just dictate terms on privacy. I mean, why would anyone trust a service that’s all about tracking?
Why do crypto startups keep backing Trump then? I remember Ripple basically sold out to please him. I’ve sold all my XRP. Never going back.
That’s just silly. Some people were excited for Trump’s so-called support for Bitcoin, but he ended up launching his own coins. We kinda gave them this power by wanting their approval.
nick.orbitFull Member
Posts: 239 · Reputation: 446
#12Sep 20, 2022, 05:00 PM
Stop with the conspiracy theories. They don’t need mixers to do anything. Monero is still an option. Blaming mixers for their issues is just weak.
It’s about why you’re using a mixer. If it’s to hide from everyone including the government, then yeah, that’s tricky.
This whole situation is a shift from just blocking mixers to actually recognizing their importance. They need better regulations instead of outright bans.
If mixers are so unnecessary, then why are they still around? They’ve got demand and that’s why governments are paying attention.
I’d say 'useless' is too harsh. But yeah, there are other ways to do what mixers do.
This is just the current administration’s take. Things could shift if power changes hands.
They should look at how cash transactions are handled. Small amounts shouldn’t be scrutinized. People just want their transactions safe.
Exactly. KYC ruins privacy. Centralized mixers? Nah, I’d steer clear. Decentralized options are way tougher for the government to tackle.
CalmFalconMember
Posts: 262 · Reputation: 176
#20Sep 22, 2022, 01:05 PM
Privacy depends on who you’re trying to hide from. KYC mixers might still work for hiding stuff from most but not from the government.
Related topics
- Thoughts on a New Privacy-Focused Social Network in Crypto? 10
- Can Bitcoin Transactions Be Traced? Privacy Risks and Future Tech 20
- IRS Turns Attention to Privacy Coins and Layer 2 Transactions 21
- Ark: A New Take on Privacy and Scalability 19
- Introducing Aperod (APRO) The Privacy-Centric Blockchain 0
- KYC vs Anonymity in Crypto Exchanges: What’s Your Take? 21