Crypto Mixers and Privacy: US Policy Changes?

20 replies 224 views
coldshardMember
Posts: 107 · Reputation: 96
#1Sep 15, 2022, 05:25 PM
What do you all think about this crypto mixer situation?
8 Reply Quote Share
topblastNewbie
Posts: 164 · Reputation: 27
#2Sep 15, 2022, 09:13 PM
So, there's this report that talks about how mixers can protect financial privacy while also mentioning bad actors like North Korea. Does this mean the US is gonna rethink their mixer regulations?
1 Reply Quote Share
HyperLynxSenior Member
Posts: 153 · Reputation: 1301
#3Sep 16, 2022, 02:28 AM
TryNinja dropped the report link about mixers yesterday. The convo there is heating up. It seems like mixers might get a legal boost, but there are still lots of restrictions. Can mixer operators really know where coins come from?
5 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 124 · Reputation: 3
#4Sep 16, 2022, 04:29 AM
Honestly, the Treasury seems to be covering up for some shady stuff. If they’re so big on privacy now, why not start with Monero or ZCash? They're still banned in the US and offer way better privacy than mixers.
0 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 99 · Reputation: 229
#5Sep 16, 2022, 07:24 AM
I don’t see it as a pivot at all. They’re just saying mixers need to keep records and report suspicious stuff, which totally undermines their purpose. Like, who’s gonna give their ID to a mixer?
3 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 18 · Reputation: 76
#6Sep 18, 2022, 07:40 AM
Exactly. Those reasons for using mixers are mostly for people whose identities are already compromised. If they can track you through spending habits, why even bother with mixers?
3 Reply Quote Share
greg365Member
Posts: 118 · Reputation: 183
#7Sep 18, 2022, 09:11 AM
But wait, if mixers have to register with FinCEN and report transactions, how is that even gonna work? Anony users won’t touch that.
0 Reply Quote Share
grimmaxiSenior Member
Posts: 12 · Reputation: 894
#8Sep 18, 2022, 11:21 AM
What we really need is a system like the Bank Secrecy Act where small transactions stay private and scrutiny only kicks in for large amounts. No one’s laundering money with a few bucks.
6 Reply Quote Share
HyperLynxSenior Member
Posts: 153 · Reputation: 1301
#9Sep 18, 2022, 12:38 PM
Totally. It feels like the US thinks it can just dictate terms on privacy. I mean, why would anyone trust a service that’s all about tracking?
5 Reply Quote Share
grimmaxiSenior Member
Posts: 12 · Reputation: 894
#10Sep 19, 2022, 05:15 PM
Why do crypto startups keep backing Trump then? I remember Ripple basically sold out to please him. I’ve sold all my XRP. Never going back.
3 Reply Quote Share
0xNodeMember
Posts: 671 · Reputation: 80
#11Sep 19, 2022, 06:21 PM
That’s just silly. Some people were excited for Trump’s so-called support for Bitcoin, but he ended up launching his own coins. We kinda gave them this power by wanting their approval.
2 Reply Quote Share
nick.orbitFull Member
Posts: 239 · Reputation: 446
#12Sep 20, 2022, 05:00 PM
Stop with the conspiracy theories. They don’t need mixers to do anything. Monero is still an option. Blaming mixers for their issues is just weak.
2 Reply Quote Share
greg365Member
Posts: 118 · Reputation: 183
#13Sep 20, 2022, 05:55 PM
It’s about why you’re using a mixer. If it’s to hide from everyone including the government, then yeah, that’s tricky.
5 Reply Quote Share
im_foxMember
Posts: 92 · Reputation: 57
#14Sep 20, 2022, 10:06 PM
This whole situation is a shift from just blocking mixers to actually recognizing their importance. They need better regulations instead of outright bans.
3 Reply Quote Share
greg365Member
Posts: 118 · Reputation: 183
#15Sep 21, 2022, 01:08 AM
If mixers are so unnecessary, then why are they still around? They’ve got demand and that’s why governments are paying attention.
2 Reply Quote Share
serHero Member
Posts: 580 · Reputation: 2321
#16Sep 21, 2022, 05:53 AM
I’d say 'useless' is too harsh. But yeah, there are other ways to do what mixers do.
5 Reply Quote Share
greg365Member
Posts: 118 · Reputation: 183
#17Sep 21, 2022, 10:49 AM
This is just the current administration’s take. Things could shift if power changes hands.
4 Reply Quote Share
LuckyByteMember
Posts: 142 · Reputation: 58
#18Sep 21, 2022, 04:11 PM
They should look at how cash transactions are handled. Small amounts shouldn’t be scrutinized. People just want their transactions safe.
3 Reply Quote Share
0xNodeMember
Posts: 671 · Reputation: 80
#19Sep 21, 2022, 08:02 PM
Exactly. KYC ruins privacy. Centralized mixers? Nah, I’d steer clear. Decentralized options are way tougher for the government to tackle.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 262 · Reputation: 176
#20Sep 22, 2022, 01:05 PM
Privacy depends on who you’re trying to hide from. KYC mixers might still work for hiding stuff from most but not from the government.
3 Reply Quote Share

Related topics