Does Bitcoin really use too much electricity just because everyone's racing to mine the last coins? Seems like all that computing power is just overkill for simple transactions.
Electricity Consumption in Bitcoin Mining: What's the Truth?
19 replies 415 views
chr1swhal3Full Member
Posts: 60 · Reputation: 254
#2Jul 10, 2017, 05:12 PM
Not really overkill, man. That computing power is what keeps the whole network safe from attacks. Plus there'll still be transaction fees to keep miners in business even after the last Bitcoin is mined.
token_laserMember
Posts: 145 · Reputation: 208
#3Jul 10, 2017, 06:50 PM
Everything in the OP is just wrong. Just do a little research instead of repeating stuff from social media.
I thought when you run a Bitcoin wallet, you automatically help verify transactions? Isn’t that the idea behind the whole network? And I read somewhere that mining is just a short-term deal until the total supply is hit.
chr1swhal3Full Member
Posts: 60 · Reputation: 254
#5Jul 12, 2017, 10:43 AM
To verify transactions, you have to run your own node and keep a copy of the blockchain. Not all wallets work that way. And yeah, miners will still be around to confirm transactions even after all coins are mined, just with fees.
So what’s with all the energy use from solving these puzzles? How does that actually work? I read it makes scaling up tough for Bitcoin as more users join.
token_laserMember
Posts: 145 · Reputation: 208
#7Jul 12, 2017, 03:39 PM
Power consumption is all about how many miners are in the game. If the difficulty drops, power use drops too. It's not really a puzzle, more like rolling dice.
So it sounds like the high power use is just part of the race to get the last Bitcoins? What’s the real blockage in Bitcoin's transaction process, though?
Think of Bitcoin like digital gold rather than cash for everyday stuff. It's not meant for daily transactions.
The proof-of-work system needs miners to find specific hashes. More miners mean more difficulty, keeping block generation steady. The real issue is the limited transactions Bitcoin can handle.
Totally agree. Satoshi probably envisioned Bitcoin as a limited resource. I doubt we’ll ever see unregulated global digital cash, but maybe a transparent system built on Bitcoin.
token_laserMember
Posts: 145 · Reputation: 208
#12Jul 13, 2017, 03:20 PM
Nope, that’s not right. Miners won’t stop mining. You can still earn fees from transactions even after the block rewards vanish.
I see where I messed up then. I thought once the max Bitcoins are out, mining would stop. So it’s just about transaction fees after that?
token_laserMember
Posts: 145 · Reputation: 208
#14Jul 14, 2017, 09:52 PM
Read what I said earlier. You can’t ignore the fees.
When a miner finds a block, they get a reward plus transaction fees. So it’s not just new Bitcoin they get. The fees will always be there.
Thanks for clarifying that! I thought it was only about new Bitcoin until the last one was mined.
There are two main issues with Bitcoin: block size and average block time. Unlimited block size could process tons of transactions, but it has its downsides.
Bitcoin behaves like cash in some ways, but with a lot less transaction capacity. It can only handle about 7 transactions per second, which isn't enough for everyone.
Right, more miners means higher prices, but if mining drops, the prices will too. Just look what happened when China banned it.
AtomicLordMember
Posts: 34 · Reputation: 184
#20Jul 18, 2017, 02:29 PM
Nope. Bitcoin only uses as much energy as it needs for security. It's about the competition and demand, not how many coins are left.