Been using Electrum for ages, can't even recall when I started. I've been pondering the whole fee/dust limit thing lately and I wonder... is there any way to find out which node I used to broadcast a specific transaction?
Can You Identify the Node Used for a Past Transaction?
17 replies 212 views
diamond_minerFull Member
Posts: 138 · Reputation: 623
#2Feb 20, 2026, 03:59 PM
Check out this thread from a while back about testing some dust transactions for segwit and non-segwit addresses. You could try connecting to different nodes with known min relay fees, see if they even accept dust transactions. If you're on Electrum, servers like LoyceV's and DireWolfM14's might help you.
I got a tiny 40 sat transaction last year. That's where I started digging.
I hear you, but what I'm really asking is if I can look back at a transaction from a few weeks ago and find out which node sent it out into the wild. I've done some digging, but it seems impossible... still looking for loopholes.
diamond_minerFull Member
Posts: 138 · Reputation: 623
#5Feb 23, 2026, 11:20 AM
Not happening. When you connect to a node, that’s the first one to grab your transaction. From there, it spreads to other nodes until it gets mined. Sure, you can see which mining pool mined your transaction, but the nodes? Nope. Can’t track that.
Looked through the Electrum code, found nothing that logs those details. You might be able to tweak the code to save a local log for future transactions, but that won't help with past ones. If you had a specific server, you’d have a shot, but sounds like you don't.
Like mcdouglasx said, it's not possible. You can enable logs to see which Electrum server you were using, but that’s about it. Then you’d have to match up the timestamp of your transaction with the log. It could get tricky if the transaction was signed and saved locally but sent later.
But hey, what could stop OP from just picking a node to broadcast their transaction now? Seems like a solid plan.
You kinda missed it. OP’s asking about past transactions. If they didn’t have a fixed Electrum server back then, it’s a lost cause.
I didn’t miss it. OP is looking to prepare for the future. If they wanna track nodes in the future, they just need to apply that method consistently. Only thing is, I don’t see the point of doing it.
CryptoRocketNewbie
Posts: 172 · Reputation: 24
#11Feb 25, 2026, 11:02 AM
I searched around but found nothing. Google didn't pull up anything useful on OP's question either. Even ChatGPT wasn’t any help.
Curious why you care about where your past transactions were broadcasted? Just wondering.
CryptoRocketNewbie
Posts: 172 · Reputation: 24
#13Feb 25, 2026, 05:25 PM
Lol why so curious about my curiosity? I made a broadcast a few weeks ago and I think I used around 0.5 sats/vbyte but I forgot which node I was on. Just curious, really. Kinda funny how I need desktop Electrum for this stuff; mobile's lacking in features.
CryptoHawkMember
Posts: 27 · Reputation: 186
#14Feb 25, 2026, 07:33 PM
I don’t know many Electrum servers that accept transactions under 1 sat/vbyte. There's LoyceV and another one I tried, but it’s been offline. Man, Electrum desktop is way better than mobile. If you’re on Android, try Blue Wallet.
node_walletMember
Posts: 83 · Reputation: 179
#15Feb 26, 2026, 01:17 AM
Are you just looking to send below 1 sat/vbyte? A few months back, I was fine with 0.2 sat/vbyte, but I run my own private server. But honestly, with the mempool this full, you’re asking for trouble. I sent BTC with 1.56 sat/vbyte and it took ages to confirm.
No way it’s good this could happen. If it did, it'd leak privacy like crazy. Imagine how easy it’d be for snoops to track stuff. I remember blockchain.info used to log IPs of the last node that relayed transactions but that was ages ago.
CryptoRocketNewbie
Posts: 172 · Reputation: 24
#17Feb 26, 2026, 07:23 AM
Logging IPs isn’t useful either. Just because it’s noted doesn’t mean it’s the originating node. If you connect directly to one node, all transactions go through it initially, which can mislead the logs.
ben.matrixNewbie
Posts: 3523 · Reputation: 35
#18Feb 26, 2026, 01:15 PM
Right? Sending sub 1 sat/vbyte transactions right now isn’t smart. Just looked at the mempool and you’d need at least 1.2 sat/vbyte for any chance of a quick confirmation. At 0.2 sat/vbyte, there’s a ton of unconfirmed transactions piling up.
Related topics
- Differences Between Transaction Versions 7
- What if a Node Syncs with a Bad UTXO Set? 9
- Issues with ripemd160 on Ubuntu 22 9
- New Bitcoin Improvement Proposal with $100 Reward 9
- Clipboard Vulnerabilities in Cryptocurrency Transactions 8
- Understanding the Differences Between Traditional and Simplified Chinese Mnemonics 6