What if big players like Binance and Coinbase decided to completely rewrite Bitcoin's structure to make it more mainstream? They could push for a centralized system under the guise of better scalability and then lobby the government. Imagine the hardcore Bitcoin fans freaking out, saying they’ll never use that version.
Can Governments Really Control Bitcoin?
19 replies 248 views
You really think the US is the only country that matters? This kind of shift isn’t happening at all. Satoshi designed Bitcoin so it could be accepted by people and governments alike.
Let’s not kid ourselves here. Look at BitTorrent it's been a decade of push and pull with the government and they still can’t fully control it. Sure, they might control secondary layers of Bitcoin, but the core? Nah, that’s a different story. And let’s be real, the world isn’t just about the US.
shard_2018Senior Member
Posts: 16 · Reputation: 1602
#4Oct 28, 2022, 11:18 PM
You think just because Trump’s involved, that would change the consensus on a global scale? A hard fork wouldn’t define Bitcoin anymore. We’ve been through forks before. The real Bitcoin would live on while others fade out.
If they had that much power, they could just create a fiat version or some garbage 'shitcoin.' But seriously, if they went after Bitcoin, it just shows how valuable it is. And this isn’t all about the US; there are other countries with skin in the game.
That sounds like a wishful fantasy. Governments have tried countless times to hijack Bitcoin's decentralized nature and failed. As long as Proof of Work is in place, decentralization stays intact. Prices may fluctuate, but Bitcoin isn't going away.
Agreed, centralized exchanges have their downsides, but they're not all based in the US. There are licensed exchanges in places like Africa. If the US tries to restrict Bitcoin, they can’t just shut down the entire market.
The US is definitely uneasy about Bitcoin because they know they can’t control it directly. They might try regulating its use through banks or specific tokens, but they won’t ever fully own it. They can war over Bitcoin but can’t break its inherent value.
You know most of Bitcoin is in the hands of Americans, right? The sheer financial muscle of the US can pressure the market. If they yanked their investment, Bitcoin could tank. The influence is real.
‘Most’ is an interesting term. Stats show about 40% is owned by folks in the US, so is that what you call most? It’s more decentralized than you realize.
LuckyDeg3nFull Member
Posts: 227 · Reputation: 408
#11Oct 30, 2022, 05:26 PM
It’s open source, so why haven’t those big firms forked it if they want a unified version? Good luck keeping those large companies aligned for too long; it’s way harder than you think.
SilentOrbitSenior Member
Posts: 97 · Reputation: 1264
#12Nov 1, 2022, 02:02 AM
Sure, anything can happen in theory. If mining pools collude with the government, miners could shift elsewhere fast. Complicit ties could lead to forks, and those in power can’t afford to see their investments devalued.
The day Bitcoin’s decentralized core is compromised would kickstart its downfall. Enthusiasts won’t just stand by as their funds lose value. It’s a fairy tale to think centralized control will ever happen.
If they were at ease, they wouldn’t be chasing mixers and suing exchanges. Comfort for them means stable rules, not constant pushback. Control over the price doesn’t equal control over the network.
What’s your take on control in this context? Just because a lot of users are American doesn’t mean the government has a grasp on Bitcoin itself.
One scenario could be that they infiltrate the core and complicate the process with unnecessary features, moving Bitcoin away from its essence as a currency. But that doesn’t solve the core scaling issues.
Bottom line, Bitcoin cannot fall under government control. It’s decentralized, miners and whales are all competing, making it tough for a single entity to dominate.
We talked about this elsewhere. Some think regulation would drop the price, others say it might soar due to increased utility. And the trademark for Bitcoin? Yeah, that's the US making calls on what can be labeled as Bitcoin.
That’s just some nonsense you’re saying. Powerful entities control politics and money. They won’t stop trying to undermine Bitcoin. But that’s exactly why Bitcoin is necessary and why it'll endure.
Bitcoin is open source. You can’t control the software and calling paperweights Bitcoin wouldn’t change the essence. Once you fork it, it stops being the original.
Related topics
- Breaking Free from Government Control with Bitcoin 20
- New US Bill Could Criminalize Bitcoin Transactions Over $10k 20
- Legal Action Against CSW Regarding Bitcoin Logo Usage 19
- Do you really own the coins if you crack a key? 12
- Is it legal to sell Bitcoin to undocumented immigrants? 10
- Return of Bitcoin from Mt.Gox: What's Next? 11