Hey, what’s everyone’s take on this? Is it even worth $150 with just 500GH/sec?
Thoughts on $150 BitAxe Solo Miner?
16 replies 402 views
real_omegaMember
Posts: 22 · Reputation: 211
#2Apr 8, 2025, 06:11 AM
Honestly, these are great for solo mining. They run low power and are quiet. Plus they're open-source. Just buy from someone trustworthy and you’ll be good. I've pushed mine to around 650GH/s with some cooling tweaks.
I think it’s overpriced. The Avalon Nano 3 is way better for low-cost, low-power mining.
But only selling Avalon on crowdfunding sites? That’s kinda lame. I’m still waiting for mine from February.
Yeah, delivery on the Nano 3 was super slow. But comparing 4TB to 0.5TB and $150 to $250+... it’s night and day. Plus, it’s hurting my sales of modified S19's.
Good point! But why such slow sales? Is production off? Maybe it’s a test-run product? I doubt they’re trying to kill competition though.
wallet_vaultFull Member
Posts: 321 · Reputation: 431
#7Apr 10, 2025, 01:43 AM
Sounds more like a side project, honestly. They threw something together to test the waters. If it sells, cool, if not, whatever. As a public company, they have to justify spending.
If the Nano 3 wasn't mediocre at the low end, it’d be cooler. $200 for under 60W/TH? Nah. Axe is more efficient for most uses right now.
tom_walletNewbie
Posts: 36 · Reputation: 8
#9Apr 11, 2025, 03:10 AM
But I gotta say, the LuckyMiners are just Bitaxe knock-offs. Quality control is really spotty on those.
Totally agree, prices are good on Nano 3 but I wouldn’t compare it to Apollo II for solo mining.
They definitely need efficient low-power gear. I’ve tried various small miners and nothing beats the Nano 3 in terms of value.
token_laserMember
Posts: 145 · Reputation: 208
#12Apr 13, 2025, 02:04 PM
There’s something called 0xAxe out now. 16 chips doing 8 TH/s at just 190W. Looking forward to the next version!
chris_chainMember
Posts: 52 · Reputation: 43
#13Apr 13, 2025, 06:19 PM
Honestly baffled by Avalon’s new Nano. A few years back, they claimed low-power wasn’t worth it.
For sure, the Nano 3 looks nice on paper, but try buying it at that price. And 140W max? Not really a heater.
They’re cheap because they’re using rejected ASICs. Charges like $150 but it really costs more to make.
ben.matrixNewbie
Posts: 3523 · Reputation: 35
#16Apr 15, 2025, 12:57 PM
They’re going after small miners for sure. I’ve tried many, but BitAxe and BitChimney stand out. Free power makes a huge difference.
ben.matrixNewbie
Posts: 3523 · Reputation: 35
#17Apr 17, 2025, 01:51 PM
Right? Two Nano 3s can earn decent profit then. Meanwhile, BitAxe is like a thousand days to break even.