I haven't seen anyone talk about the biggest worry I have with trying out alternative blockchains. I know some might think I’m just spreading FUD against anything not Bitcoin. But seriously, let’s not forget basic computer security while getting hyped about being early adopters.
Staying Safe with Alternative Blockchains
21 replies 353 views
Totally agree with you. And yeah, using different passwords applies not just to exchanges but also to forums, emails, and pools too. Plus, some antivirus programs really don't like mining software unless it’s whitelisted.
For sure. Don’t trust everything those big names in Bitcoin say about alt chains. Some folks think 1 confirmation is better than 3 faster ones. But if you read Satoshi’s paper, it’s clear that more confirmations equal more security.
hyperledgerMember
Posts: 7 · Reputation: 127
#4Sep 27, 2021, 09:12 PM
Good point! Using an altcoin client could easily lead to a hidden virus targeting Bitcoin wallets. If you own a lot of BTC, I wouldn’t risk running other clients on the same machine... maybe I’m just paranoid?
Yeah, if you’ve got a bunch of BTC on a PC, being super careful with third-party software is a must. Whether it’s an alt client or even some random game, better safe than sorry.
HumbleStakeFull Member
Posts: 7 · Reputation: 534
#6Sep 28, 2021, 02:10 AM
Sucks for people with only one computer. Thankfully, I've got a few so I can safely use my alt miners.
You can actually have several wallet files. Just need one portable Bitcoin client on an encrypted drive for safety, and a regular one for daily transactions. You don't usually send out 5000+ BTC, right?
I think there's no reason why multiple chains with different features can't exist together. You could have a super reliable chain with only the best features, plus a fast, experimental chain, and even specialized ones like Namecoin.
People with one computer can still keep wallets and apps separate using user accounts. Like on Linux, run different coins under separate accounts and lock down their directories.
Honestly, Artforz didn't destroy anyone's credibility as much as some others in this space. His bad PR is nothing compared to the drama others create.
It’s like a tradition to only fix stuff when there’s an actual attack happening. I’d rather take a proactive approach, but this seems to be the norm in the crypto space.
I totally agree. That's why I haven't dabbled in alt chains much. I mentioned it before but nobody seemed to care.
Let’s keep it real, Gavin isn’t some angry god who can punish those he doesn't like. This drama is ridiculous.
real_wizardNewbie
Posts: 4 · Reputation: 37
#14Sep 30, 2021, 12:45 AM
Right? Especially when someone like CH challenges you to do something stupid.
You'd think coders would know better than to provoke others. LOL.
token_laserMember
Posts: 145 · Reputation: 208
#16Sep 30, 2021, 05:00 AM
LOL it’s open source, there’s no real hierarchy here. No one can really control anyone else.
crypt0novaSenior Member
Posts: 1 · Reputation: 805
#17Sep 30, 2021, 06:22 AM
The Namecoin situation isn’t done and it’s definitely impacted BitcoinExpress. I dug into the blockchain rewrite and it’s something that can be achieved while still mining BTC. It’s a big deal.
That’s something you should definitely check out, Gavin.
I’m curious if there’s even a case of malware spreading through this route or if it’s just theory. Seems more like infosec bravado.
Exactly. We need solid evidence for that.