Circle Sued Over $280M Hack of Drift Protocol

13 replies 184 views
shard_2013Full Member
Posts: 634 · Reputation: 287
#1Jun 10, 2023, 07:45 AM
Circle's CEO recently claimed they freeze funds only at court orders, unlike USDT's quicker actions. Now they're facing a lawsuit for not freezing stolen funds from the Drift Protocol.
7 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 124 · Reputation: 3
#2Jun 10, 2023, 09:22 AM
Knew this was gonna happen. If Circle keeps this up, they’ll have tons of lawsuits. Being centralized means they added a blacklist to their stablecoin, and they should be more responsible. If they don’t wanna take on that risk, they should decentralize USDC. But profits, right?
3 Reply Quote Share
5tacks4tsHero Member
Posts: 136 · Reputation: 2261
#3Jun 10, 2023, 10:14 AM
Just saw that Tether stepped in to help Drift, so investors are okay for now. But honestly, Circle dropped the ball big time here. As a centralized issuer, they had one job and totally failed.
0 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 142 · Reputation: 110
#4Jun 10, 2023, 11:41 AM
It sucks but they kinda have a point. Without court orders, they don’t have to freeze anything, but they should be proactive about it. A hack on their site looks bad for business, and they’re gonna lose customers fast.
2 Reply Quote Share
CalmMinerFull Member
Posts: 554 · Reputation: 784
#5Jun 10, 2023, 02:29 PM
This is gonna get intense. Another hack, more legal drama. Tether is trying to recover losses while Circle is just quiet, huh? If they wanna keep customers, they really need to step up.
2 Reply Quote Share
5tacks4tsHero Member
Posts: 136 · Reputation: 2261
#6Jun 10, 2023, 06:40 PM
Exactly! Back in the day, all trades used Bitcoin as collateral, which was super risky if a hack happened. Now everyone's using stablecoins to avoid that risk.
4 Reply Quote Share
maxoracleMember
Posts: 352 · Reputation: 74
#7Jun 10, 2023, 08:49 PM
How they gonna pay back those investors? That $148M feels more like a stopgap than a real solution. If they’re counting on revenue to pay back, that could take ages.
2 Reply Quote Share
5tacks4tsHero Member
Posts: 136 · Reputation: 2261
#8Jun 11, 2023, 02:05 AM
Why decades? They can cover some losses now and the rest over time. The protocol might have taken a hit too, so it shouldn’t be all on them.
1 Reply Quote Share
alt_forkMember
Posts: 228 · Reputation: 236
#9Jun 11, 2023, 07:45 PM
Seriously though, why blame Circle for this? Drift’s team messed up their security. Circle can freeze funds, but it’s got to be via a court order. Feels like blaming Circle is just misplaced frustration.
6 Reply Quote Share
5tacks4tsHero Member
Posts: 136 · Reputation: 2261
#10Jun 11, 2023, 07:59 PM
If Drift asked Circle to freeze the funds and Circle didn’t act, they might be in trouble for not doing enough. The court could see that as neglect.
2 Reply Quote Share
the_satNewbie
Posts: 255 · Reputation: 6
#11Jun 12, 2023, 02:05 AM
Yeah, but Circle isn’t forced to just freeze funds because someone asks. What if someone pretends to be the owner? They could get sued for acting on that.
4 Reply Quote Share
sage_2014Member
Posts: 13 · Reputation: 133
#12Jun 12, 2023, 07:49 AM
Circle doesn't owe a quick response to hacked platforms. If they're sued over not freezing funds fast, the court might throw that out. Drift is responsible for their own funds.
1 Reply Quote Share
alt_forkMember
Posts: 228 · Reputation: 236
#13Jun 12, 2023, 10:45 AM
Tether’s ready to help and could freeze funds promptly. If Circle makes it clear they won’t do the same, protocols will start using USDT. They can’t risk losing market share.
0 Reply Quote Share
5tacks4tsHero Member
Posts: 136 · Reputation: 2261
#14Jun 13, 2023, 10:02 PM
Exactly! As a public company, Circle can't let this slide. They need to take responsibility and offer some compensation to avoid a mass exit to USDT.
0 Reply Quote Share

Related topics