Can AI Help Create Quantum-Resistant Crypto?

Why isn’t there more AI involved in making new cryptos? Seems like it’d be super helpful for people who don’t code but get blockchain stuff. Are folks just not gonna trust an AI-made coin? Btw, it’s my first time posting here, been lurking for ages! Hey everyone!

I'd totally be down to try that, but juggling multiple projects isn’t easy. Some of these projects are like delicate babies, ya know? Can’t just leave them unattended. Finding personal assistants would help a lot, but good luck finding volunteers who wanna work for free.

Q. Why not just use AI to whip up more shitcoins? A. Honestly, there are already way too many out there!

Think it could be worth diving into? Could be a fun side project and might hit a sweet spot. Or is the whole AI-made coin idea a turn-off for most?

You’re missing the point: a coin needs a solid reason to exist if it wants to hold value. Without that, who’s gonna bother mining it? Anyone can create a token, but with all these failed coins, you gotta prove there's actual use behind it.

Some people here just don’t get it, posting nonsense they can’t comprehend.

The crypto world is overrun with these useless coins already. Adding more via AI just wastes energy and resources. Plus, a lot of these coins end up scamming people, so I’m against it!

If you think creating a blockchain is as simple as writing a prompt, you’re way off. The coding is complex, and you gotta know the ins and outs of your blockchain. And maintaining it without a solid grasp of programming? That’s a recipe for disaster.

AI can help automate some coding, but it’s not a magic bullet. Security and economic soundness matter. An AI could make a working smart contract but might unknowingly add vulnerabilities, which investors definitely don’t want.

Honestly, you’re dealing with folks who just don’t get reality. Investors often act without thinking, like they don’t realize Bitcoin’s mining didn’t aim to push science forward.

Sounds cool in theory, but it’s way more complicated in practice. AI might help write code, but crafting secure crypto needs solid cryptography and security knowledge. A tiny mistake could be huge. Trust is a biggie too; people won’t jump into an AI-made coin without security and real use cases. Quantum resistance is still a work in progress.

You’re talking to Bitcoin enthusiasts. They don't understand reality and can’t grasp that Bitcoin’s mining algorithm wasn’t meant to drive scientific progress.

Just tossing buzzwords around, huh? Sure, you can create a 'quantum computer,' but saying you can make a 'quantum-resistant crypto using AI' is just a bunch of mumbo jumbo.

If everyone starts making coins, how can any of them hold value? It just fragments worth across tons of coins. Plus, chasing quantum tech for the sake of it is pointless; we’re bound to have tons of quantum-resistant chains eventually.

Best to ignore the chatter about quantum computing and AI if folks don’t even understand reversible computing.

You could compensate them with the coins you create. But let’s be real, who’s gonna help you when those coins are new and unproven?

Why would anyone trust AI-created cryptocurrencies? How will you fix bugs in it when you don’t even know the tech? If it’s too easy to make, then it’s gonna feel generic and no one will care.

If your coin doesn’t have a purpose or use case, what’s the point? If it’s just about making money and you can’t market it, leave the coin-making to those who know what they’re doing. About that quantum-resistant crypto do we even have AI capable of creating that now?

According to OP, AI should fix bugs, right? Hey maybe AI can just send me some Bitcoin too. If it’s so smart, shouldn’t it be able to sort that out for me?