Some folks are pondering what happens after 2140 when no new BTC will be minted. If miners can’t rely on block rewards, what’s the motivation to keep mining? Opinions are all over the place.
Will miners still have incentives after 2140?
20 replies 144 views
I’m thinking transaction fees might just cover it. But then again, if BTC prices skyrocket, will there be enough transactions to keep miners interested?
Honestly, just go play around on testnet3. You’ll see the dynamics there. If it works there, why not on the mainnet?
Yeah, but testnet is different. The mainnet has way more at stake. The 20-minute block time is a big difference too.
Isn’t it pretty much the same deal? Miners will just adjust to whatever fees are available. But if nobody’s transacting, then what?
Mining difficulty will adjust eventually if miners can’t make profits. But we can’t just assume fees will be enough.
If fees don’t cut it, it’s gonna be a mess. But I think Bitcoin will adapt somehow. Maybe ordinals will just move to a different protocol.
DarkMatrixMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#8Feb 23, 2017, 08:25 AM
Fees are key, but you can’t overlook the bigger picture. A century from now, who knows if Bitcoin will even exist?
I disagree. The fee structure is vital. Without it, miners don’t have any reason to keep processing transactions. Plus, if cryptography gets outdated, that’s a whole different problem.
DarkMatrixMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#10Feb 23, 2017, 03:09 PM
True, but they could always use second layers. If Bitcoin still has unique value, it’ll survive even with high fees.
We’re worrying about 2140, but what about sooner? The next couple of halvings might be a real issue for security.
Exactly! The block reward will get tiny, and if fees can’t support miners, we’re in trouble.
So, how do we fix this? Tail emissions or switch to PoS, but that brings its own set of issues.
DarkMatrixMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#14Feb 24, 2017, 01:45 PM
What if it becomes an altcoin? People burning overprinted coins could push prices up, making it a viable option.
Yeah, but that’s speculative. Bitcoin has a legacy, and if it changes too much, will it even be Bitcoin anymore?
DarkMatrixMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#16Feb 24, 2017, 11:26 PM
There are always alternatives. Just look at history. Bitcoin might not be the only game in town in 100 years.
But then again, miners just need to be incentivized to keep blocks flowing. If they have enough fees, it could work.
DarkMatrixMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#18Feb 25, 2017, 06:26 AM
Mining hardware does not determine confirmation needs. It’s about the network design and how many confirmations are needed.
If transactions drop off, so will mining. In that case, ordinals might just find a new home elsewhere.
DarkMatrixMember
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#20Feb 25, 2017, 01:02 PM
The real question is: what’s the threshold between secure and insecure? Hashrate isn’t everything.