What’s Up with the Nakamoto Bitcoin Upgrade?

21 replies 89 views
chain2011Senior Member
Posts: 18 · Reputation: 842
#1Oct 10, 2025, 09:10 PM
Just came across this news on the Nakamoto upgrade from coindesk. Apparently, Bitcoin's Layer-2 network, Stacks, is kicking it off.
4 Reply Quote Share
the_satNewbie
Posts: 78 · Reputation: 6
#2Oct 11, 2025, 03:18 AM
Honestly, it's not just Stacks. We got Lightning Network, MAP, Liquid, and Rootstock too. They all play a role in how users interact with Bitcoin. But I think most folks will stick to Lightning for everyday low-cost stuff. No hard fork necessary.
0 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 47 · Reputation: 24
#3Oct 11, 2025, 04:16 AM
Right? Stacks seems more focused on smart contracts than actually fixing scalability issues. Generally, Layer-2 solutions are the way forward, but Stacks may not be the best example.
4 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 215 · Reputation: 62
#4Oct 11, 2025, 06:15 AM
To clarify for the OP: the hard fork is specific to Stacks, not Bitcoin itself. So changes can happen over there without messing with Bitcoin's main network.
0 Reply Quote Share
mr_apeNewbie
Posts: 139 · Reputation: 35
#5Oct 11, 2025, 08:09 AM
I’d say the main reason Bitcoin isn’t used as currency is simply its rising price. Who’s gonna spend $15k on a coffee when it could be worth $70k a few months later? Scalability is kinda irrelevant at that point.
1 Reply Quote Share
tom2014Legendary
Posts: 23 · Reputation: 4721
#6Oct 11, 2025, 11:27 AM
Totally agree. Plus, Stacks is more about creating tokens rather than actually solving Bitcoin's scalability. It's like a separate ecosystem with its own rules.
5 Reply Quote Share
alexsatNewbie
Posts: 110 · Reputation: 15
#7Oct 11, 2025, 03:03 PM
Yeah, and when speed is prioritized, it often comes at the cost of security in blockchains. If I'm moving serious funds, I won't trust these sidechains for big transactions.
3 Reply Quote Share
chain2011Senior Member
Posts: 18 · Reputation: 842
#8Oct 12, 2025, 03:46 PM
I plan to cover Stacks soon. But as for the Nakamoto Upgrade, from what I know, it doesn’t activate sBTC until late 2024. It’s just a step towards making it work.
1 Reply Quote Share
mr_apeNewbie
Posts: 139 · Reputation: 35
#9Oct 12, 2025, 07:14 PM
Didn’t realize there were so many networks already! Seems like Lightning steals the spotlight. But yeah, this Nakamoto upgrade is an optional add-on, not what Bitcoin users are really asking for.
0 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#10Oct 12, 2025, 08:18 PM
Stacks is kinda in between a Layer 2 and a sidechain, but leans more towards sidechain. It has its own blocks and rules, which can change with upgrades like this one.
0 Reply Quote Share
0xSeedFull Member
Posts: 24 · Reputation: 257
#11Oct 13, 2025, 12:29 AM
You know LN only handles like 1% of all Bitcoin transactions? It has its own issues too. Feels super niche and I think many see it as a failure.
0 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#12Oct 13, 2025, 05:43 AM
Why use BTC for a coffee now when you could buy a coffee shop soon? The deflation aspect kinda negates the need for scaling.
3 Reply Quote Share
dave.forkMember
Posts: 143 · Reputation: 185
#13Oct 13, 2025, 07:18 AM
But if Bitcoin isn’t used for small purchases, its growth is going to be limited. Digital cash demand is way bigger than any real estate hype.
1 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#14Oct 13, 2025, 12:51 PM
Stacks is just an altcoin, not a true Layer 2. People want an asset that can hedge against inflation, more than they want cash.
3 Reply Quote Share
dave.forkMember
Posts: 143 · Reputation: 185
#15Oct 13, 2025, 06:34 PM
Monero is actually gaining traction for utility. It’s being used more for transactions recently.
4 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#16Oct 13, 2025, 08:07 PM
Re-read my question then.
4 Reply Quote Share
dave.forkMember
Posts: 143 · Reputation: 185
#17Oct 13, 2025, 09:56 PM
Demand will follow price. Everyone’s piling in for different reasons.
3 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#18Oct 14, 2025, 03:40 AM
True, but I don't get how you think the need for cash is greater than the need for a store of value.
4 Reply Quote Share
chad69Newbie
Posts: 5 · Reputation: 33
#19Oct 16, 2025, 01:48 AM
Look at PayPal. Clear demand for transaction processing. Store of value is quieter. Monero seems to have a leg up on privacy.
1 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 205
#20Oct 16, 2025, 07:26 AM
But why would I go back to Bitcoin? Monero seems sufficient for my needs.
3 Reply Quote Share

Related topics