Stablecoins and the Need for Transparency

2 replies 230 views
tom2020Full Member
Posts: 11 · Reputation: 695
#1Mar 21, 2019, 11:01 AM
Tether and Circle are facing some serious heat to show solid proof of their reserves. With the way supply is increasing, regular audits are becoming a must. Traders really need to trust stablecoins, because any hint of doubt could send markets into chaos. Do you guys take reserve reports at face value or do you keep your guard up with stablecoins?
4 Reply Quote Share
bull2011Member
Posts: 116 · Reputation: 125
#2Mar 21, 2019, 02:10 PM
Is there even a way to trust them without skepticism? Just like with centralized exchanges, we’re kinda gambling on our funds being safe. Honestly, it’s pretty tough to avoid volatility without relying on pegged stablecoins. Sure, transparency is key and it’s great they’re being pushed to show it, but it feels kinda hypocritical that stablecoins need more scrutiny while banks are getting relaxed on reserves too.
4 Reply Quote Share
alt_forkMember
Posts: 228 · Reputation: 236
#3Mar 21, 2019, 06:12 PM
I only trust reports when they come from reputable auditors. Like Circle with Deloitte and Thornton LLP on their side. Plus, they have that MICA standard for operating in the EU and they follow AICPA standards in the US, even got their assets listed on Nasdaq. On the flip side, Tether's transparency is pretty lacking. They didn’t get the Mica license and aren’t fully compliant with US reserve standards. So yeah, Circle is way more reliable in my eyes compared to Tether.
3 Reply Quote Share

Related topics