Discussion on Adding Theft Prevention Features to Bitcoin

13 replies 251 views
WildLynxMember
Posts: 4 · Reputation: 49
#1Jul 3, 2019, 04:24 AM
Just saw a proposal about adding a theft prevention feature in Bitcoin. Sounds interesting but also kind of risky. Anyone have thoughts?
4 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 75 · Reputation: 12
#2Jul 3, 2019, 04:51 AM
Looks like the proposal isn't too complicated, which is cool. I’m not a coder myself, but I think I get it. If I mess something up, feel free to correct me!
0 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 269 · Reputation: 62
#3Jul 3, 2019, 10:52 AM
Honestly, I doubt this will ever fly. The proposal is lengthy and has some sketchy tech details. Like, how many flagged transactions can one person create? And what happens with multi-sig wallets?
2 Reply Quote Share
max2013Newbie
Posts: 46 · Reputation: 24
#4Jul 3, 2019, 04:39 PM
Right? And what if a long time passes? Can they just roll back transactions that happened weeks ago? If the funds got mixed, how do you even know whose money to freeze? Seems overly complicated.
3 Reply Quote Share
wizard_2016Full Member
Posts: 46 · Reputation: 575
#5Jul 3, 2019, 06:16 PM
I don’t see the need for all these new features. We can already handle transfers with what's out there. Why complicate things?
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 76 · Reputation: 37
#6Jul 4, 2019, 02:21 AM
But Bitcoin's decentralized nature is meant to prevent any authority from interfering. Introducing this could lead to more issues than it solves.
2 Reply Quote Share
max2013Newbie
Posts: 46 · Reputation: 24
#7Jul 4, 2019, 05:11 AM
Exactly, freezing funds isn't okay if it means hurting innocent users. They need to rethink this whole setup.
1 Reply Quote Share
WildLynxMember
Posts: 4 · Reputation: 49
#8Jul 4, 2019, 11:15 AM
The proposal does include a decentralized way to handle things with Community Verification Nodes, which sounds like it could help. Still, the balance seems tricky.
3 Reply Quote Share
max2013Newbie
Posts: 46 · Reputation: 24
#9Jul 4, 2019, 01:42 PM
Wait, so if UTXOs are already spent, can they still be reversed or not? This back and forth is confusing.
2 Reply Quote Share
WildLynxMember
Posts: 4 · Reputation: 49
#10Jul 4, 2019, 02:29 PM
They clarified that once spent, you can't reverse those transactions. But tracing the funds is a different story. They can work with exchanges to recover, not actually change the blockchain.
4 Reply Quote Share
max2013Newbie
Posts: 46 · Reputation: 24
#11Jul 4, 2019, 07:34 PM
You said that, but earlier it sounded like you could reverse some transactions. It's all very vague and leads to misunderstandings.
1 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 269 · Reputation: 62
#12Jul 4, 2019, 10:37 PM
Yeah, and what if a lot of people didn’t get refunded even if the CVNs agree? How do you define that?
2 Reply Quote Share
satoshi_vaultFull Member
Posts: 9 · Reputation: 687
#13Jul 5, 2019, 06:17 PM
It’s just like how reversals work with double spending. Once the transaction confirms, it’s done. This proposal kind of misses that point.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 1362 · Reputation: 35
#14Jul 5, 2019, 08:02 PM
So, is the focus on preventing scams or just making the process more complicated? Feels like it could turn central very quickly.
1 Reply Quote Share

Related topics