Kinda weak argument for smart contract safety though. If banks lost money like this, they’d be toast. $100M from DeFi? Just another Tuesday. But a real bank loses even $10M and it’s headline news.
Just saw the Drift Protocol hack. It eclipsed all the other Q1 losses combined. Most of these hacks are from compromised dev keys, not even smart contract issues. Hopefully DeFi creators take a hint and secure up.
Hoping hacking isn’t the norm moving forward. It’s us users who feel the pain. DeFi projects hardly want to take responsibility for their own mess. Founders get the profits, but we take the hits.
These DeFi hacks don’t even make headlines, unlike banks. The Drift Protocol situation is just sad. If the key wasn’t compromised and it’s not the smart contract, we gotta wonder about insiders.
Honestly, it’s not rocket science. We have terrible coding as it is. Plus, social engineering still runs rampant. There are plenty of scammers out there pulling straight-up cons. This isn’t going away anytime soon.
After Satoshi, trust in pseudonymous founders really dropped. Transparency could help, but it also invites scrutiny and potential legal issues. Hiding behind ‘hacks’ won’t save a sinking project.
+1 to that. That’s why big players stay away from DeFi. People say DeFi has too many risks for major institutions. Exploits and hacks are holding it back.
Their security ‘guarantees’ are just one-time audits. Some projects offer bounties, but they’re tiny compared to potential losses. Way too much risk for little reward.