Concept of Tokenizing Transaction Space in Bitcoin

8 replies 486 views
jakenodeHero Member
Posts: 2 · Reputation: 4208
#1Feb 26, 2018, 04:51 AM
So here's the thought: Every byte or "vbyte" on the blockchain could be tokenized. Basically, you buy and sell these on a built-in marketplace within the Bitcoin client. Miners would have to sell these tokens on this marketplace to gain any real value from them. Anyone wanting to make a transaction would first need to grab these tokens, which could be automated through market orders. You’d have an order book and some charts to visualize transaction costs.
3 Reply Quote Share
chr1swhal3Full Member
Posts: 60 · Reputation: 254
#2Feb 26, 2018, 05:18 AM
But why tho? What’s the point for Bitcoin? This just complicates things unnecessarily, like many other crypto ideas.
4 Reply Quote Share
jakenodeHero Member
Posts: 2 · Reputation: 4208
#3Feb 26, 2018, 07:50 AM
Honestly, this could potentially reveal transaction costs better. Right now, users often don’t know what fee to set, which is kinda a glaring flaw in Bitcoin. I remember sending tiny amounts of bitcoin years ago and the fees were just a shot in the dark. It feels like that’s always been a problem.
2 Reply Quote Share
mr_apeNewbie
Posts: 401 · Reputation: 35
#4Feb 28, 2018, 02:08 AM
We actually have a fee system that addresses this. It’s naturally competitive. Users pay fees to claim their bytes in blocks. Creating another market feels risky and could lead to centralization, plus price manipulation could inflate fees.
3 Reply Quote Share
chr1swhal3Full Member
Posts: 60 · Reputation: 254
#5Feb 28, 2018, 05:52 AM
You're making a simple system way too complicated. Why add all this stuff? Bitcoin is fine as it is, no need for tokens!
2 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 682 · Reputation: 62
#6Feb 28, 2018, 08:24 AM
Most people just go with whatever fee their wallet suggests. The more experienced ones can check out specific websites for fee guidance. Even back in the early days, options were out there to set transaction fees.
2 Reply Quote Share
greg1337Member
Posts: 148 · Reputation: 42
#7Feb 28, 2018, 12:13 PM
I find this idea intriguing but more as a side addition rather than a main solution. Like, if miners want more funding, they could sell block space in advance, especially for future transactions. It’s kinda like futures trading.
4 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 682 · Reputation: 62
#8Feb 28, 2018, 05:56 PM
Pools are already offering extra services for income! Paid acceleration and including special types of transactions are a thing, so why change it?
3 Reply Quote Share
ben2019Newbie
Posts: 21 · Reputation: 37
#9Feb 28, 2018, 06:04 PM
I see where you’re coming from, but most Bitcoin wallets do suggest fees pretty reliably. And about "vbyte costs" being fixed? That’s not true. When the mempool is clear, those vbytes are worthless. Value only comes in when the unconfirmed transactions pile up. It’s all market-driven, man.
6 Reply Quote Share

Related topics

Concept of Tokenizing Transaction Space in Bitcoin | Cryptotalks