This year has been wild for Bitcoin ETFs, right? First time they’re actually launching on the US stock market. Like, just a few years ago, the SEC was rejecting everything. But then BlackRock steps in and bam, things change.
Bitcoin ETFs: Are We Witnessing a New Era or Just a Passing Trend?
20 replies 46 views
Yeah I saw that, but I’m still nervous about these quantum computers. I mean, if they get powerful enough, they could crack Bitcoin wallets. That’s a risk nobody seems to mention.
Not really buying that though. Experts say we’re a decade away from quantum tech being a real threat. By the time it happens, those ETF companies will have moved on with better security.
So are you saying BlackRock and others will just roll in and change Bitcoin’s code for our safety? Remember when SegWit came out? It wasn't pretty. We ended up with a lot of forks and half the miners left.
I think it’s more about the community than just one company. Forking BTC could hurt them as much as it hurts us. If there’s a quantum threat, I trust the devs to handle it right.
noty0urkeysSenior Member
Posts: 64 · Reputation: 834
#6Jun 7, 2018, 05:02 AM
Yeah but after those forks, Bitcoin lost like 40% of its value. And who knows if miners would stick with a new chain if it means switching from the original.
True, but that’s all hypothetical. Quantum and 51% attacks have been around in talk for ages. They're still not a real threat to Bitcoin. Plus, devs are always improving the protocol.
nonce_2018Member
Posts: 142 · Reputation: 110
#8Jun 7, 2018, 07:10 AM
But 40% drop? That’s no joke. And what if miners don’t support new developments? The SEC might stop trading before any real changes happen.
I see your point, but look at it this way. If quantum computers can break SHA-256, we’ll have bigger problems than just Bitcoin. And those machines aren’t sitting in everyone’s basement.
It's amazing how people freak out about quantum threats yet forget how their own data is secured. Banks, servers, everything’s encrypted. If quantum tech can break those, we’ll be in deep by then.
Right? Focus on what we can control now. Worrying about the future’s challenges won’t help us now. Best to make profits while we can.
chris_maxiNewbie
Posts: 219 · Reputation: 36
#12Jun 9, 2018, 12:00 AM
But can we really rely on just SegWit and Taproot? We haven’t seen real scalability or smart contracts yet. What if we need those fixes, and miners are just stuck?
Every chain has its potential to grow. BCH had its time but Bitcoin will always be Bitcoin just better copies. Miners want profit, and that’s what they’ll mine.
What about wallets though? There are so many untouched wallets with Bitcoin. If those owners don’t move for years, could that be a risk if they eventually come back?
real_protoNewbie
Posts: 200 · Reputation: 14
#15Jun 9, 2018, 11:39 AM
Exactly. Those wallets could get hacked, sure. But that wouldn’t tank the entire market. It might shift prices a bit but not destroy Bitcoin.
Yeah but let’s be real. No insurance coverage for ETFs means total loss if Bitcoin crashes. Trust in the SEC would take a hit too.
The Grayscale lawsuit changed everything. BlackRock sees this as a huge step forward for Bitcoin ETFs. It’s not over yet Bitcoin will stick around.
So you think the SEC will fold under pressure? I doubt it, some big player making waves might push them to adapt instead.
Absolutely. I think ETFs are just the beginning. BlackRock’s fund is already killing it. More people want in on Bitcoin, and that trend isn’t slowing down.
I hope you’re right. The future looks bright for Bitcoin if these ETFs keep gaining traction.
Related topics
- Brazil's New Bitcoin Reserve Proposal: What to Expect? 20
- Gold vs Bitcoin: Who's Really Outperforming? 20
- Can Bitcoin Really Fight Inflation? 9
- China's Focus on Gold and Bitcoin: What's Really Happening? 20
- Will Bitcoin Break Its All-Time High Before the 2028 Halving? 20
- Bitcoin as a Hedge Against Inflation 20