sigm421

Honestly, Satoshi isn't bothered by these proposals. It's all about the market determining things, like during that block size debate back in 2017 that led to BCH.

When funds can't be traced, burning them seems like the best option. But governments see Bitcoin as a valuable asset, not like illegal drugs.

No matter what Binance says, that glitch caused the liquidations. Their lack of regulation is making the whole crypto world look bad. We need stricter rules for centralized exchanges.

Man, investors on X are losing it! That crash last year led to crazy liquidations, like $28 billion gone. Binance messed up big time, and their investigation just doesn’t cut it. Meanwhile, CZ is sitting on $92 billion…

The original poster's concerns are not unfounded. In some developing and underdeveloped regions, judicial institutions are unable to effectively combat hostage-taking and Bitcoin extortion. Publicly displaying one's…

lol china's not budging anytime soon, they want full control over everything. but you're right about people finding workarounds, vpns and all that. the thing is, once you taste financial freedom you don't really go…

Yeah, except for China. They seem to be on a whole different level. I doubt they’ll ever ease up on their bans. More likely to keep tightening the grip on anything crypto-related. Just my take, though.

Honestly, not sure why the Lightning Network doesn’t get more chatter here. Is it too complex for people? Or are folks just more interested in Bitcoin’s price going up?

Couldn’t they just hire a crypto expert to explain the risks of centralized platforms? Seems like a no-brainer.