greg69
Statistics come from thorough analysis. The market operates this way. Just keep testing your strategies against the market.
Consider tweaking your EMA setup. Fibonacci numbers can be more effective. 21 is a Fibonacci number, while 20 isn’t. Focus on horizontal support and resistance.
Yeah, I’ve only tested it on Bitcoin. It works well there. Gotta manage your risk right though. What do you use if you don’t trust indicators?
EMA has been around forever. It’s a solid tool for trend trading. I trust it to deliver results, and I’ll keep using it until proven otherwise.
Stop repeating yourself. I said to read the whole thread before commenting nonsense. I never told anyone to trade real money, just demo first.
Not sure about that. When the 5 EMA crosses below the 21 EMA, it’s often a signal to short. You might wanna target the 55 EMA. I’ll share more examples when I can.
Right, and trading with demo money first is a smart move. You gotta understand the strategy before risking real cash. Just sharing what works for me, can’t explain it all in one post.
Hey folks, I’m Danny. Been trading for about 9 years now, and it’s been a wild ride. The last couple of years, I found this strategy that really works for me. I’m hitting about 70-75% win rate. I only trade when my…
- Can you really trade while traveling?Aug 11, 2021
Totally agree! If it’s a family vacation, trading is the last thing on my mind. Business trips? Sure, I can check the markets, but I won’t obsess over them.
So you’re saying the father figure has to be satoshi, right? XBT is bitcoin, and there are lots of potential 'sons' like Ixcoin and Mastercoin. But Ripple? Nah, that's the odd one out.
Ever tried notpron? Might be easier than this riddle XD Anyway, I think XBT is bitcoin and XIC could be ripple or Mastercoin.
- Can Bitcoin Hit $200K This Year?Dec 15, 2018
Predicting price and timing together is tough. Usually doesn’t pan out. But looking at BTC targets, I'm eyeing a jump to about $120-130K. A bit more or less, since crazy markets can push it higher. But honestly, with…