d4ve69
Senior Member
6
Posts
892
Reputation
Apr 25, 2020
Joined
Recent posts
Anyone have intel on the scanned ranges? Not all of us have top-tier rigs, but we wanna be in the mix. I’m using a simple Python script myself.
Yeah, let's keep those old discussion links alive. Some real gems in there.
I ran tests with a 35-bit range and 50 million keys. Your low false collision probability doesn’t seem right.
Using binary search to split and store keys is a big deal. It cuts down search time significantly when you’re dealing with large datasets.
But traditional methods also limit your space. If you set a collision margin at 64, you still get faster results, even with a giant database.
What’s the point of this over just storing full public keys, though? Scanning for sequences might take ages without a better structure.