If war breaks out between the US and Europe, Bitcoin could hit $1 billion. All major banks are in these regions, and a conflict would shut them down, leaving Bitcoin as the only viable option for transactions.
Are you for real? US and EU fighting? They’re both in NATO! Plus, Europe’s not just one place. A tank rolling through France doesn’t stop banks in New York from functioning. This is a wild scenario with almost no chance of happening.
Seriously, where do you get this idea? A war between the US and Europe? That's like saying pigs can fly. Bitcoin isn’t gonna be the government’s go-to in a conflict either. Let’s keep it realistic.
I’m all for peace, not war. People should realize Bitcoin can grow without a conflict. Look at its rise from under a dollar in 2010 to over 40k now. No war needed for Bitcoin to be valuable.
This sounds like Balaji’s $1M Bitcoin bet. If Bitcoin ever hit $1M, something huge would happen globally. But predicting $1B? That’s a stretch and honestly, who wants a World War III?
There are plenty of ways for Bitcoin to rise without war. Relying on conflict to boost prices is just grim. Sure, if stocks flop, people might turn to crypto as a hedge, but that’s not a healthy way to grow.
Right? Like everyone’s gonna rush to buy Bitcoin when banks close. What are they gonna use? Cash? Reminds me of Cyprus when people were stuck and couldn’t buy BTC. And you really think trillions are gonna flood into Bitcoin during a global conflict?
You seem a bit lost, buddy. If people think Bitcoin will hit $5M, it’ll take decades. And now you’re saying $1B? You need some solid proof for that. It’s just your guess.
Your theory is flawed. A war would affect banks, sure, but Bitcoin nodes and miners are gonna be hit too. Less miners mean slower transactions. So, even if people want to buy, good luck getting it through.
Honestly, there’s more tension with Russia than the US. Even if something crazy happened in the EU, you think Bitcoin’s gonna hit $1B? Gold is still the go-to for stability.
If Bitcoin rises from war, that’s not something to celebrate. War means chaos, not a healthy market. Bitcoin’s price can rise without destruction. Look at how it hit 42k without military conflict.
If Bitcoin hits $1B, the number of billionaires will skyrocket. But finance elites won’t want that. They prefer the rich stay rich and the gap widens. To get to $1B, we’d need trillions in Bitcoin market cap.
If regulators ease up on Bitcoin and people invest, sure it could rise. But if we’re at war, it’ll just be nominal price gains as we’ll all be poorer from the conflict.
Bitcoin doesn’t need war to thrive. It’s valuable as a decentralized currency. It’s gaining traction every day, with more individuals and companies adopting it. It should be a safe haven, not a profit from a disaster.
I’ve said this before but it got lost. Bitcoin hitting $1B isn’t gonna happen overnight. It can rise without a war. Wars disrupt lives and economies, and that’s not a recipe for growth.
A war between nuclear countries is catastrophic. No one’s thinking about Bitcoin in that scenario. It’s about survival, not profit. Past events like COVID showed Bitcoin doesn’t react well to crises.
You’re dreaming if you think war will boost Bitcoin. Look at real-world examples. The Ukraine conflict didn’t send Bitcoin soaring. Bitcoin’s future depends on positive global events, not disasters.
You really think banks will just print money to buy crypto? If that happens, the value of USD and EUR might drop like crazy. You’ll be richer than a Zimbabwean dollar! Forget about getting rich with such ideas.
EU’s not itching for war, but if it happens, Bitcoin isn’t going to $1B. It might rise as people seek safety for their wealth. But seriously, wanting a war just to see Bitcoin soar? That’s selfish.