NIST Announces Initial Post-Quantum Encryption Standards

5 replies 385 views
max2013Newbie
Posts: 43 · Reputation: 24
#1Jun 29, 2019, 04:06 AM
Moody mentioned that the analysis of the two other algorithm sets is ongoing, but these new PQC standards are key. He thinks we shouldn’t wait for future updates and just get into using these three. Gotta be ready in case someone cracks them, but honestly, for now, these are the real deal.
2 Reply Quote Share
0xNodeMember
Posts: 257 · Reputation: 80
#2Jun 29, 2019, 05:15 AM
They’re gonna have a tough time switching things up, cause ECDSA signatures are pretty rigid. Like, if they wanna change the signature type, it means upgrading the witness version. That’ll require a new address type and a soft-fork... sounds complicated, right?
3 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 215 · Reputation: 62
#3Jun 29, 2019, 07:21 AM
I’m not expert in cryptography, but I feel like they need to tackle a couple things first. For instance, figure out which PQC method fits with Bitcoin. The abstract for FIP 203 is kinda vague, doesn’t even mention signature methods. They should also verify the security of each method carefully and not overlook possible backdoors.
3 Reply Quote Share
max2013Newbie
Posts: 43 · Reputation: 24
#4Jun 29, 2019, 08:41 AM
It’s definitely more than just about signatures... Bitcoin relies heavily on Elliptic Curve Cryptography for its security. Rebuilding that foundation is gonna be a massive task. I wonder if the community will actually step up and take action instead of waiting for issues to arise.
3 Reply Quote Share
yield2016Full Member
Posts: 16 · Reputation: 538
#5Jun 29, 2019, 10:47 AM
Migrating won’t be a walk in the park... Changing encryption feels like messing with the coin’s core. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a fork for this migration. And let’s be real, the original blockchain probably stays until quantum computing can actually break the encryption. Might take decades before any real changes happen.
4 Reply Quote Share
max2013Newbie
Posts: 43 · Reputation: 24
#6Jun 29, 2019, 11:21 AM
Yeah, like a bitcoin cash situation. Old coins would still exist on the old chain, while the new coins would be on this fresh network. Hope they get a fork going sooner rather than later. Might take some trial and error to get it right, though.
4 Reply Quote Share

Related topics