Are IEOs really the best option we have now? Or just a slightly better version of a bad idea?
IEOs: Are They the Future or Just a Stopgap?
20 replies 418 views
probablynothingFull Member
Posts: 120 · Reputation: 589
#2May 26, 2020, 12:15 AM
How do exchanges plan to comply with laws when tokens can be traded externally? It seems like a loophole waiting to be exploited.
Pretty sure it's the lesser evil for sure. I mean, IEOs are way better than the ICO chaos from a couple of years back. But hey, there’s still room for SEC to accuse projects of selling securities.
Yeah, but it's not all sunshine. IEOs have entry barriers now, smaller investors get pushed aside. Feels like the rich just get richer.
cobra_hawkSenior Member
Posts: 6 · Reputation: 1811
#5May 28, 2020, 09:29 AM
Totally agree, man. It’s like if you’re not a whale, good luck getting in. Profits might not be as wild as before, but I guess some returns are better than nothing.
pixel_vaultFull Member
Posts: 64 · Reputation: 260
#6May 28, 2020, 11:16 AM
Not sure if it’s a disadvantage for US citizens. They can't invest directly, but once the tokens hit the market, they can buy. It’s a safer way to see where prices gonna go.
Seems like IEOs are helping the market bounce back. Exchanges wouldn’t take the risk if they weren’t confident; they have a lot to lose.
Not the solution we need, just a decent band-aid for now. But IEOs can be manipulated. How does sales sell out in seconds? Sounds fishy.
Regulations are still a mess. No wonder US exchanges avoid IEOs. I'm curious about how they keep US customers out. KYC? Maybe.
IEOs do help us find legit projects easier. Exchanges vet them, but profits still come down to market reaction. At least we trade quicker than with ICOs.
True, but most ordinary investors can’t participate in top exchanges. It’s all about the big players getting first dibs.
Seems like consensus is IEOs bring more liquidity. But legally? I don’t think they’re any safer. They’re still just like any old token sale.
Yeah, people think investing in IEOs is safe because they’re supposedly vetted. But legitimacy is a whole different ballgame.
Exactly! IEOs can be legal if done right, but unregulated stuff is risky. They’re definitely better than ICOs, but we’ve got a long way to go.
CryptoDegenSenior Member
Posts: 3 · Reputation: 1358
#15Jun 1, 2020, 11:10 PM
If the exchange is legit and not faking numbers, then IEOs are probably a step up from ICOs. But still, do your homework.
Fundraising through exchanges is the only way to survive right now, but IEOs still have fraud risks. Just looking at an exchange isn’t enough.
From ICOs to STOs, now IEOs. As a lawyer, the legal stuff around IEOs is a headache. No clear rules yet from governments, so we’re kinda left in the dark.
Why do you think lawyers are a bad idea for TGEs? Shouldn't they tell clients to avoid ICOs due to all the scams?
A lot of IEOs helping bounty hunters cash out easily now. Some projects even trade while doing an IEO, builds trust for new investors.
ericrocketFull Member
Posts: 3 · Reputation: 646
#20Jun 2, 2020, 03:31 PM
No way lawyers are the reason for ICO failures. Many were just scams hiding behind flashy websites.
Related topics
- Are White Label Launchpads a Startup Must-Have or Just Hype? 0
- New Charity Token Alert: BabyBitcoin (BBTC) 1
- Thoughts on Innosilicon T2T Miners 5
- Need Advice on Recovering Funds from an ICO Investment 20
- How to Participate in the IOPN Airdrop 1
- The Evolution of Token Sales: What's Next After the Hype? 19