SoFi just dropped SoFiUSD, a stablecoin tied to the dollar, on Ethereum and Solana. They're the first national bank in the U.S. doing this directly for retail customers on a public blockchain.
First U.S. Bank Launches Stablecoin for Retail Users
20 replies 246 views
Isn’t this just more noise? A dollar-backed stablecoin feels pretty redundant. What’s the difference between that and good old USD? We need something more innovative, like Bitcoin.
I’m kinda skeptical about stablecoins in general. They’re pegged to the dollar, which has its own problems. Why invest in dollars digitally when that’s the fiat we’re trying to escape from?
But the dollar isn’t on Solana or Ethereum... You can’t just take that dollar and pop it into DeFi. How can you not see how significant this is?
Honestly, using a stablecoin in a bank account isn’t really revolutionary. It’s the same old game. You can’t just move it around freely like with crypto wallets. You’ll always have to convert back and forth.
Curious to see how this shakes things up for other banks. If SoFi pulls this off, you might see a wave of similar moves in the banking sector. They’ve got the users.
What’s the big deal? It’s just another dollar stablecoin. Why launch a new one instead of picking an existing one that’s already recognized? Are we really going to care in a year?
chris.viperMember
Posts: 63 · Reputation: 213
#8Nov 23, 2019, 03:41 PM
Having a stablecoin from a national bank is a big update. It could mean better backing and less chance of it losing its peg compared to those private ones.
Stablecoins aren’t truly stable though. They just lose value over time. Holding them could mean losing purchasing power, while other cryptos like Bitcoin could rise.
Exactly! Buying them through a bank app is different from third-party services. If SoFi’s doing it, big banks will probably follow. It’s a big deal.
Seems like banks are jumping on their own stablecoin train instead of working on the CBDC idea. Lots of stablecoins coming, but too many could just clutter the market.
This could lead to increased scrutiny for AML compliance as more bank-issued stablecoins make their way in. Just look at USDT holders facing challenges with their deposits.
chris.viperMember
Posts: 63 · Reputation: 213
#13Nov 24, 2019, 10:03 PM
Yup, the more issuers, the better. We’ve seen a ton of stablecoins lose their peg, it’d be good to have banks pushing for stablecoins backed by real reserves.
Huge news for sure, it gives SoFi a competitive edge. I wonder why other banks are still hesitant to get on board. This is a no-brainer for the future.
I recognize SoFi from their NBA sponsorships. But seriously, do we really need another stablecoin? Aren’t we getting overloaded?
I’m not convinced this is a good move. Just because they say it’s backed 1:1 doesn’t mean it is. Banks have histories of collapsing and losing customer funds.
chris.viperMember
Posts: 63 · Reputation: 213
#17Nov 25, 2019, 06:39 AM
More stablecoins can be a double-edged sword though. If they’re backed properly, it gives us more options and could lead to healthier competition.
sigma_ninjaFull Member
Posts: 18 · Reputation: 252
#18Nov 25, 2019, 10:07 AM
They need to get regulatory approval first, so it could be a wait and see situation. For real impact, we need more big banks jumping on board.
The stablecoin market is getting crowded, but launching SoFiUSD on both Ethereum and Solana is a smart move. At least this one’s coming from a bank, not just some startup.
Integrating crypto into apps isn’t as easy as it sounds. Managing nodes is a whole headache and most fintech companies just outsource that.