Not sure if this is the right thread, but I’m kinda worried about what I’m hearing. The Epstein files are back in the spotlight. For those who don't know, Epstein was a billionaire involved in some really dark stuff, and now I’m seeing claims that 3 out of 5 Bitcoin core devs are linked to him. Is that even legit? Could it affect Bitcoin’s code?
Concerns About Bitcoin Tied to Epstein Files?
19 replies 78 views
Honestly, I can't see how this would affect Bitcoin at all. So what if some devs are on that list? The Epstein files have exposed a lot of people, but none of them seem to have suffered serious consequences. Why would Bitcoin be different? It's not owned by anyone.
swiftorbitNewbie
Posts: 66 · Reputation: 39
#3Oct 6, 2018, 01:25 AM
I’m not worried. I doubt anything malicious will come from this. I mean, with these files, anyone could be implicated. Even celebrities like Gordon Ramsey are mentioned.
There’s some info below the tweet the OP mentioned that clarifies things a bit. Honestly, this whole fuss seems blown out of proportion. Rich people have been indulging in weird stuff forever. Why is anyone surprised? It’s like, welcome to reality.
Exactly, the beauty of Bitcoin is its decentralization! The founder isn’t even known. So how does a leak like this affect the protocol? If anything changes, it won't matter if the majority don’t support it. Bitcoin follows what the majority decides.
Totally agree. It's probably just another clickbait topic to get people riled up.
I’m so done with Epstein and the drama. You really think these rich folks would keep records of their crimes? This info is probably 5% real and 95% gossip. What’s the actual agenda behind this leak?
I’m with you on that except for the last part. People believe what they want to believe.
Changing Bitcoin code isn’t a solo mission. It requires a consensus among the devs. That’s what makes it decentralized. The Epstein matter has nothing to do with Bitcoin protocol. No need to stress about it.
swiftorbitNewbie
Posts: 66 · Reputation: 39
#10Oct 7, 2018, 06:28 PM
It’s all speculative. I don’t think this info will lead to any real changes. Let’s not start a drama fest over this.
Developers can create proposals, but any change has to be approved by the network. So three or five devs can’t just decide to alter Bitcoin. It’s not gonna happen.
What ifs are pointless. They usually don’t come true. And Bitcoin has a whole team behind it, not just a few people. It’s all about consensus.
What’s different now? Bitcoin has always had its controversies and shady associations. If it’s survived this long, why worry now? It’s been a haven for all sorts of characters for years.
The Epstein thing is old news. If it were possible to change the code, those devs would’ve done it ages ago. Who knows what the future holds, but we’ll see.
Sure, changes can happen, but they need miners' approval to go live. So if some devs are linked to Epstein, Bitcoin is still in good hands. It’s decentralized.
Epstein funded a bunch of legit causes. Just because he’s associated with Bitcoin doesn’t mean it’s tainted. He wasn’t just backing Bitcoin, so why focus on it?
dave.walletNewbie
Posts: 27 · Reputation: 5
#17Oct 12, 2018, 04:41 AM
Not saying Bitcoin will crash because of this Epstein stuff, but if three core devs are implicated, it could panic the market. And we all know how panic affects prices.
The leaked documents focus mainly on Gavin Andresen, who left Bitcoin Core ages ago. He was barely involved with Epstein, just a donation to MIT. The new devs aren’t linked.
n1nja_2020Newbie
Posts: 47 · Reputation: 19
#19Oct 14, 2018, 08:39 AM
Personal lives of core devs don’t affect Bitcoin itself. They’re just a small part of a much bigger picture. Bitcoin will keep running smoothly.
Epstein’s criminal ties are concerning. But linking personal connections to control over Bitcoin is a stretch. Bitcoin operates on open code and community consensus, not trust in individuals.