RogueGuru

Yeah, I'm feeling the same way... had the same issue with no PRs or issues showing. Makes me wonder if relying on GitHub for Bitcoin development is wise. What do you all think?

This thread is about assets not sent to quantum-safe addresses in a 5-year frame. I saw a draft suggesting a 3-year instead. It’s in Phase 4, I think.

Interesting take! But why even mix quantum-resistant hashing with ECDSA? If ECDSA is toast, you’re done for regardless.

ECDSA and R-values? I think we need a bigger block size. 4 MB won’t cut it only a few SPHINCS+ transactions fit in there when today we have a ton.

I might’ve missed it. Can you lay it out? How do you go from 50 kB to 50 bytes?

I noticed they mentioned SegWit v3. Looking at the code, max block size is capped at 4 MB. I don’t get why it can’t go higher, like 2 GB. Not sure we’d ever fill that.

I disagree, not the same as Lopp’s BIP. Bitcoin Foundation's ownership doesn't make it untrustworthy. Domains like bitcoin.org are owned by others too. Seems like jealousy to me.

Saw a new BIP hit the dev mailing list. It’s about making Bitcoin quantum-resistant. I checked the links and found more info on bitcoin.foundation. Thought I’d share this here, see what people think.