Just saw this news that might shake things up for Bitcoin. If you're really worried about US debt, Harris seems like the only logical choice this election.
Impact of Presidential Candidates on National Debt and Bitcoin
20 replies 96 views
So basically, Guy A is gonna be twice as bad as Guy B. Makes ya wanna just not vote at all, right? Just campaign for whoever wins to do better on debt management. Sad state of affairs.
kevin_bridgeFull Member
Posts: 196 · Reputation: 677
#3Apr 6, 2018, 11:21 AM
This issue isn't just in the US. Political parties worldwide prioritize winning votes over good leadership. Why do people keep falling for smooth talkers who can't lead?
stake_2017Newbie
Posts: 182 · Reputation: 12
#4Apr 8, 2018, 06:13 AM
Who funded that study? LOL. Harris would wreck the economy. Sure, her tax hikes would push successful people to leave. Trump’s plan seems better for Americans, but let's not kid ourselves.
Pick your poison: bucket of crap or bucket of diarrhea. They both stink.
Harris hasn't proposed new taxes for anyone under $100 million. Trump, on the other hand, wants to raise taxes on everyone. Funny how this topic got buried by the pro-Trump mods.
Not a Trump fan, but you sure do love to bash him. What about the damage Harris could do? It's tough picking a leader when neither option looks good. We’re stuck with the lesser evil.
His tariff plans? Those are his go-to campaign lines. And yeah, he thinks racism is great for business proudly says it, too. Bitcoin soared under Biden. Just saying.
bear_diamondMember
Posts: 30 · Reputation: 208
#9Apr 10, 2018, 05:18 AM
True, winning elections is key. But good politicians get sidelined by corrupt ones. If they don’t play ball, they don’t rise up the ranks.
In the US, it's all about popular vote during primaries.
You sound so biased, it's hard to take you seriously. It feels like it’s always either a bad choice or a worse one. It’s not just a US problem, we tend to vote for the least bad option.
Just read the facts for yourself. Trump isn’t hiding his tariff plans; he’s boasting about them. My stance isn’t radical, it’s reality.
In my voting history since '76, I’ve seen a lot of ups and downs. Trump was a bust for me. Biden was great for my mining ventures.
tony_4tl4sMember
Posts: 286 · Reputation: 84
#14Apr 11, 2018, 03:41 AM
Simple reason: Trump is worse for debt. He’s created tons in a short time. Why would anyone think he’d change now?
Half of the forum might take that as an insult. Many don’t see reality with Trump and Bitcoin. I think there’s something unsettling about him.
They know Trump will raise debt and favor the rich. But they’d rather stick with their side than let the other win. It’s a messed-up mindset.
Kamala might not be great, but she could be better than Trump. At least she'd inspire kids as the first female president.
I just don’t see it. Under Biden, inflation went down, and jobs are up. Bitcoin even jumped 500%. How can people ignore that?
wallet_oracleMember
Posts: 225 · Reputation: 170
#19Apr 12, 2018, 05:55 AM
People really forget fast. How can you support a guy with so many legal issues? It’s wild that 50% of Americans resonate with that.
Why would this news even impact Bitcoin? If Trump wrecks the US economy, it could actually boost Bitcoin as people flee to it.