Debate: Is Private Property More Important than Equality?

19 replies 438 views
WildFarmMember
Posts: 4 · Reputation: 188
#1Oct 6, 2017, 03:14 AM
Imagine someone just like us, sitting at their computer, and suddenly they discover Bitcoin. A few people realize its potential and buy in when the price is super low, risking it all. Fast forward decades, and now everyone’s talking about its value.
5 Reply Quote Share
stacksatsHero Member
Posts: 404 · Reputation: 2023
#2Oct 6, 2017, 09:24 AM
If you really think forced redistribution could work, then decentralization is out the window. Seriously, chill.
3 Reply Quote Share
atlas51Member
Posts: 547 · Reputation: 40
#3Oct 6, 2017, 03:40 PM
Why shouldn’t the government cover my losses from mining and all those forgotten coins? Let’s make it fair and hit millionaires with a 10% wealth tax to help the poor. Why should only Bitcoin holders take the hit?
2 Reply Quote Share
5igm4777Member
Posts: 118 · Reputation: 131
#4Oct 6, 2017, 08:08 PM
You can't be serious. The government telling the richest 1% to share? That’s a stretch. People have held gold forever and no one forced them to share their wealth. Look at history; it doesn’t support your idea.
2 Reply Quote Share
hypernovaFull Member
Posts: 95 · Reputation: 791
#5Oct 8, 2017, 11:51 AM
Life's not fair. We’re not born equal because equality means everyone is the same, and that’s just not how it works. If we want fairness, we need a complete overhaul of the social system. Maybe communism is the answer? It’s tough but not impossible...
0 Reply Quote Share
dave.forkMember
Posts: 375 · Reputation: 185
#6Oct 8, 2017, 02:18 PM
Forced redistribution is just a fancy way of stealing. The early Bitcoin adopters took huge risks when nobody believed in it. They earned their wealth, and I’d choose foresight over a gunpoint equality any day.
3 Reply Quote Share
cobra21Full Member
Posts: 27 · Reputation: 528
#7Oct 8, 2017, 03:12 PM
Any form of wealth distribution would just be unfair to early Bitcoin believers. Sure, it might cause some new issues, but I don’t see it happening because fiat is still around. Justice will improve in the future, so I’m not worried.
4 Reply Quote Share
WildFarmMember
Posts: 4 · Reputation: 188
#8Oct 9, 2017, 10:38 AM
Not saying it’s gonna happen, but imagine if miners were pressured to give up their Bitcoin. It could be a harsh reality, but the network wouldn’t fall apart. Just throwing out a worst-case scenario.
0 Reply Quote Share
maxorbitMember
Posts: 177 · Reputation: 162
#9Oct 9, 2017, 02:46 PM
The government doesn’t get to dictate how I spend what I earned. My forefathers took risks, so why should I support the lazy folks who didn’t? They only have a right to tax my capital, not tell me how to redistribute.
2 Reply Quote Share
0xRocketMember
Posts: 333 · Reputation: 188
#10Oct 9, 2017, 08:42 PM
Forced redistribution leads to more problems down the line. Wealth is concentrated because some people create value and take risks, while others just waste money. I’ll always back capitalism over any other system.
4 Reply Quote Share
mr_apeNewbie
Posts: 401 · Reputation: 35
#11Oct 9, 2017, 09:49 PM
You’re talking about wealth distribution, not just Bitcoin. This leads to grumbling masses, not revolutions. Plus, wealth disparity comes from countless factors, many unrelated to Bitcoin. It actually gives more people a chance to participate.
4 Reply Quote Share
lynx1337Newbie
Posts: 211 · Reputation: 15
#12Oct 10, 2017, 12:08 AM
Why target Bitcoin for redistribution? There are bigger assets like gold or tech. Wealth redistribution should hit the super-rich, and most Bitcoin holders aren’t in that category. Bitcoin has actually helped some people find financial freedom.
2 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 116 · Reputation: 41
#13Oct 10, 2017, 03:06 AM
Sure, pioneers have an advantage, but do we punish them for taking risks and spotting opportunities? They deserve their rewards. History shows us that there’s always envy towards successful people. If you want equality, go out there and earn it.
4 Reply Quote Share
byte_2015Member
Posts: 104 · Reputation: 221
#14Oct 10, 2017, 07:49 AM
It’s not fair to penalize someone for seeing a chance that others missed. If you didn’t invest in Bitcoin early, tough luck! No one should benefit from what they didn’t work for.
4 Reply Quote Share
wagmiNewbie
Posts: 301 · Reputation: 14
#15Oct 10, 2017, 11:56 AM
Exactly. Those who got in early took real risks when Bitcoin was unproven. Punishing them now is just wrong, especially in a voluntary and decentralized environment.
2 Reply Quote Share
gang2015Member
Posts: 682 · Reputation: 62
#16Oct 10, 2017, 03:25 PM
Similar arguments have been made about gold and other assets. Unless we have a dictatorship, I doubt any government would go for this redistribution idea. We have better ways to reduce inequality, like a progressive tax system.
2 Reply Quote Share
ben_alphaMember
Posts: 37 · Reputation: 59
#17Oct 10, 2017, 04:45 PM
Governments are already scheming new ways to tax us harder. Adding more requirements wouldn't be a stretch for them. Even if Bitcoin inheritance sounds crazy, it’s becoming a reality with taxes.
5 Reply Quote Share
coin07Full Member
Posts: 160 · Reputation: 641
#18Oct 10, 2017, 07:11 PM
What would I do? I wouldn’t pay. Forced redistribution is dumb. Taxes already do that, and they have their own issues. We can’t rely on people’s kindness, so they force us.
5 Reply Quote Share
Posts: 138 · Reputation: 44
#19Oct 10, 2017, 11:36 PM
It’s unfair for them not to even bother learning about Bitcoin. They didn’t take the chance when it was cheap and now want a piece of the pie? I’m keeping my Bitcoin to myself.
4 Reply Quote Share
SilentBearFull Member
Posts: 63 · Reputation: 453
#20Oct 11, 2017, 01:52 AM
Even if I had no Bitcoin, I wouldn’t support this redistribution idea. It seems like the government is trying to be compassionate, but it’s really about those who chose to ignore Bitcoin when it was a low-risk investment.
2 Reply Quote Share

Related topics